Both documents were silent on the possibility of family visits for administrative detainees. 16.

It appears that the accused denied their involvement in the crimes in question, kept silent and refused to give urine or sperm for examination.

In particular, Ts. had been working for the investigation and, despite being aware of the violations of the applicant’s rights, had failed to lodge any complaints; F. had also been “silent”, had not reacted

The official shall also explain to the arrested person his/her rights: to be legally represented; to be provided with medical assistance; to make statements or to remain silent; to inform [third] persons

In this connection, it notes that the judgment of the appellate court remains silent as to what actions the court had taken in order to verify whether the applicant or his lawyer had been duly notified

decision came as a complete surprise to him and to the vast majority of practitioners, and that the whole case was unprecedented in his experience: in particular, if the Revenue had not kept totally silent

However, the applicant merely stated that he had not been using his mother’s vehicle and otherwise chose to remain silent, thus waiving the opportunity to refute the evidence against him.

Before questioning, however, suspects would be cautioned, that is, informed of their right to remain silent and that anything they said could be taken down and produced as evidence.

    The Court further notes that at the ensuing trial both of the applicant’s co‑accused admitted to the charges and thus had no apparent reason to remain silent.

    The general principles with regard to access to a lawyer, the right to remain silent, the privilege against self-incrimination, and the relationship of those rights with the overall fairness

Save for the appellate court’s general statement that the applicant’s allegations were unsubstantiated (see paragraph 18 above), the judgments in the applicant’s case remained silent as to the underlying

upon apprehension Regardless of the offence with which they are charged, persons shall be informed as soon as they are taken into custody of the reasons for their apprehension, their right to remain silent

The Supreme Court, however, was silent on the question of costs in respect of these 10 decisions. 17.     On 26 January 2005 the estate of K. and K.'

It is important to note that the applicant exercised his right to remain silent in his police interview and denied having killed a police officer in his statements to the public prosecutor and the investigating

did the Court of Cassation provide any such reasons either when it quashed the applicant’s acquittal or when it upheld the trial court’s second decision to convict him, which was, as indicated above, silent

    The Court observes that the Supreme Court’s judgment of 7 July 2005 is silent on the issue of the applicants’ absence at the hearing.

V.K. was quite silent and reserved, different from other days. He took out his cash cards from his wallet and an address noted down on a paper and said that A.T. should send them home.

    In view of the above-mentioned consequences for the applicant company’s procedural rights, the Court finds that the domestic courts could not, as a matter of fairness, remain silent in respect

représenté par la SCP CHARDON & NAVREZ, avoués à la Cour assisté de Me Charles RAHOLA, avocat au barreau de REIMS INTIMÉE : SCI SEJELACE, sise 3 rue de Sillery-51490 BEINE NAUROY représentée par