CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0908DEC001879007
8 septembre 2009
This was tantamount to an assumption of guilt during the appeal proceedings.
Page 76 sur 2399
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109440
14 décembre 2011
It appears that he signalled to the investigator that he had been beaten during his arrest.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0518DEC002897295
18 mai 1999
The Office of the Prime Minister will consider nominating a person to represent the State during the case.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD002654008
19 décembre 2013
During the night or early in the morning the applicant had engaged in oral sex with V. and K. 26.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922JUD001307407
22 septembre 2020
Both accounts of the events were examined during the pre ‑ investigation inquiry and during the trial.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016DEC004188605
16 octobre 2018
41097/10 18/06/2010 Sezgin AKSOY 20/01/1986 Bursa Abdurrahman ŞAHİN The applicant was injured during his military service.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0324JUD005666012
24 mars 2016
The Government submitted that they had left the ward during the delivery. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0308JUD003477909
8 mars 2018
During the next hearing, held on 3 October 2007, the applicant made a statement on the charges.
ECLI:CEDH:001-206185
23 octobre 2020
It was suggested that at a certain point during the pre-trial investigation V.G. recognised the applicant as the perpetrator. 54 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1109JUD007140910
9 novembre 2018
During that first interview, the applicant explained that he had met M.B. in early 2007 through C.L., his then girlfriend.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0306DEC002472494
6 mars 1998
The names of the two boys were not disclosed during the proceedings but the judge ordered that the names be made public at the end of the trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD002570311
28 novembre 2013
She argued that the applicant had not signed any record during his questioning by the police. 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD003349804
10 mai 2012
Officer K. confirmed his statements during a reconstruction [conducted as part of the] investigation on 16 August 2002.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0404JUD004190720
4 avril 2024
Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning detention in a metal cage during court hearings; Korshunov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1007JUD003981916
7 octobre 2025
it was obliged to pay them salary supplements for work during unsociable hours, pursuant to the general rules of labour law (see paragraphs 32 and 33 below).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202JUD000208205
2 février 2016
During this period, the applicant cannot be seen by the camera.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1104JUD002946403
4 novembre 2010
(b) Time-limits for detention “during investigation” 32 . After arrest the suspect is placed in custody “during investigation”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0623JUD002002404
23 juin 2011
During the ensuing proceedings he was represented by different court-appointed counsel. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD003871103
22 avril 2010
Those statements were made during the pre-trial investigation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211JUD003254108
11 décembre 2012
During this period the hearing was postponed for about four weeks at the co-defendants’ request. 14.