Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173342
5 avril 2017
5 avril 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, in particular their right to impart information, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127973
8 octobre 2013
8 octobre 2013
She further complains that the suffering caused to her because of lack of an effective investigation and timely punishment of those responsible has caused her serious suffering, contrary to Article 3 of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203138
25 mai 2020
25 mai 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in view of the alleged error of diagnosis and inappropriate
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203664
18 juin 2020
18 juin 2020
Did the restrictions on the publication and distribution of the applicant’s book amount to discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203949
23 juin 2020
23 juin 2020
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198338
8 octobre 2019
8 octobre 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention Strand Lobben and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187016
18 septembre 2018
18 septembre 2018
They also complain that they were denied a fair hearing in violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention due to contradictory decisions handed down by the Court of Cassation on identical cases, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181535
13 février 2018
13 février 2018
2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF the CASE The application concerns, firstly, the Supreme Court’s refusal to reduce the applicant’s sentence of imprisonment on the basis of new case-law adopted by that court contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155562
26 mai 2015
26 mai 2015
THE PARTIES Having regard to the cumulative effect of the “dangerous detainee” regime imposed on the applicant from 27 October 2009 to 3 April 2014, has he been subjected to treatment contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC005119908
23 septembre 2014
23 septembre 2014
The applicant complained, in particular, that he was not provided with suitable psychiatric treatment during his detention in the Kyiv pre-trial detention centre, which was contrary to Article 3 of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211393
30 juin 2021
30 juin 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211400
30 juin 2021
30 juin 2021
Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to respect for confidential communication with their lawyers, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see Altay v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207992
21 janvier 2021
21 janvier 2021
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in light of the proceedings for the return of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214174
17 novembre 2021
17 novembre 2021
U-III-559/2019 of 19 July 2019 and U-III-4420/2019 of 17 September 2020 it quashed such decisions on costs in cases similar to that of the applicant as being contrary to the right of access to a court
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9004
29 mai 1997
29 mai 1997
; ‑ treatment of applicants discriminatory when compared to ministers of Greek Orthodox Church - failure of military courts to take account of the above resulted in applicants' arbitrary detention contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217859
13 mai 2022
13 mai 2022
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210795
31 mai 2021
31 mai 2021
The Government Office informed the applicant that, contrary to previous practice, the Ministry of Human Resources no longer assessed whether the diagnosis of transsexuality was well-substantiated based
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218011
24 mai 2022
24 mai 2022
lodged on 2 December 2016 communicated on 24 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the refusal to acknowledge the applicant’s property right over a house and surrounding land, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248462
12 janvier 2026
12 janvier 2026
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see, for example, Savva Terentyev v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146082
11 juillet 2014
11 juillet 2014
Moreover, his detention was contrary even to the “legislation of Transdniestria”. 2.
Source officiellePage 76 sur 1005