CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114369
8 octobre 2012
Alleged events of 27 and 28 April 2009 Allegedly, on the evening of 27 April 2009, on his way to a shop in Zasillya village, the applicant was stopped by police officers of the Zhovtenvyy
Page 76 sur 3166
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019DEC004488506
19 octobre 2021
In the meantime, Mr Iv. was arrested on 15 April 2006 on the street.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206DEC003068103
6 décembre 2007
On 16 April 2003 the Rostov Regional Court upheld the judgment. The judgment of 21 January 2003 has not been executed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0624DEC004600499
24 juin 2003
The court held hearings on 15 May, 28 August and 14 November 1991, 29 January, 22 April, 27 May and 30 September 1992, 23 February and 7 June 1993, 28 March and 25 April 1994, 28 June 1995, 27 March
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC003073803
11 décembre 2007
On 16 April 2003 the Rostov Regional Court upheld the judgment. The judgment of 22 January 2003 has not been executed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626DEC000964102
26 juin 2007
The Government submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits of the case on 14 April 2006.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104DEC001812705
4 novembre 2008
of 29 April 2003 concerning Mrs Solodukha) the domestic courts awarded the applicants compensation to be paid by municipal companies.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-50512
15 mai 1997
expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; Whereas, at the 534th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies held on 7 April
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55496
16 novembre 1990
Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"), Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Van Droogenbroeck case delivered on 24 June 1982 and 25 April
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-982
22 avril 2010
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 129 April
ECLI:CEDH:001-182527
27 mars 2018
On 26 April 2000 the applicant became a shareholder in a limited company (“the company”). On 28 April 2005 the applicant withdrew from that company.
ECLI:CEDH:001-217513
4 mai 2022
On 12 April 2019 he was recognised as a refugee but was excluded from refugee status on grounds of national security.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146466
25 août 2014
On 6 April 1998 the Municipal Court ordered the enforcement of the judgment of 12 August 1992 and on 10 December 1999 it ordered the enforcement of the judgment of 28 April 1994.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0916DEC002443403
16 septembre 2010
On 30 April 2002 the Vorkuta Town Court index-linked the judgment debt and awarded the applicant RUB 34,067.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229577
13 novembre 2023
2), no. 66338/09, 30 April 2015).
ECLI:CEDH:001-229632
22 novembre 2023
In April 2022, the SJC again dismissed the applicant, reiterating its initial finding before the remittal that the relevant time-limit had started to run from February 2020 (when V.D. had become member
ECLI:CEDH:001-109600
13 janvier 2012
On 6 April 2005 he was transferred to a tuberculosis hospital in another detention facility. He was diagnosed with tuberculosis.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0918DEC004433110
18 septembre 2018
On 29 April 2012 the Court transmitted the Government’s letter to the applicant, but the latter did not comment. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC001558311
27 mai 2014
By a letter of 11 April 2014 the applicant accepted the terms of the declaration. 6.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323JUD006350100
23 mars 2006
The judgments of 6 April 1998 and 19 April 2000 were not executed. 17.