CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 564 résultats pour « STUBBE Marc »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD000000708

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2010

27 avril 2010

Päivi Hirvelä,   George Nicolaou,   Zdravka Kalaydjieva,   Mihai Poalelungi, judges , and Michael O’Boyle, Deputy Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 16 September 2009 and on 10 March

Page 75 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409DEC003937120

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2024

9 avril 2024

France cases would be held on 29 March 2023, and a hearing in the present case would be held before the same composition of the Grand Chamber at a later stage. 8 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0907JUD002142416

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2023

7 septembre 2023

This was not, however, before it informed the applicant that several reports and studies had found in favour of lifting the ban on disclosing non-identifying information, and that France’s position made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114951

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2010

14 décembre 2010

margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid }       FOURTH SECTION Application no. 19840/09 by Harry SHINDLER against the United Kingdom lodged on 26 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0505JUD002499921

Admin. suprême

5 mai 2026

5 mai 2026

the complaint concerning the judicial independence and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 20 January and 18   March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD007330314

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2020

17 décembre 2020

    Although Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 applies only to a person’s existing possessions and does not create a right to acquire property (see Stummer v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD005085910

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2013

27 juin 2013

    On 9 March 2010 the Migration Board decided not to reconsider the case, finding that no new circumstances justifying a reconsideration had been presented.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000487116

Admin. suprême

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

comments were received from the Governments of Denmark, France, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom, as well as from the Human Rights Centre of the University of Essex, the Institute of International Studies

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0528REP002935795

Admin. suprême

28 mai 1998

28 mai 1998

MARXER       M.A. NOWICKI       I. CABRAL BARRETO       B. CONFORTI       N. BRATZA       I. BÉKÉS       J.

Source officielle
CA

Chambre 1-6

6a192f82cdc6046d4754ec51

Appel

28 mai 2026

28 mai 2026

ROUX, greffier auquel la minute de la décision a été remise par le magistrat signataire. *** EXPOSE DU LITIGE Le 17 mars

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0716JUD006881714

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2020

16 juillet 2020

Azerbaijan (no. 69981/14, 17 March 2016); Mammadli v. Azerbaijan (no. 47145/14, 19 April 2018); and Aliyev v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708JUD003362906

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

The demonstration took place at the former location of a statue of Karl Marx, which had been removed by the authorities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1208REP001153385

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 1987

8 décembre 1987

  The pupils of the Anna School would after nine years' studies have the same and in some cases even better skills and knowledge than the pupils in the municipal schools.   45.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0114REP001347087

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 1993

14 janvier 1993

Marxer.   The parties were represented as follows: the Government by Mr. Wolf Okresek of the Federal Chancellery and Mr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0403JUD002722995

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2001

3 avril 2001

Prison officer Haley, who returned Mark Keenan to his cell following the visit, recalled that Mark Keenan was very talkative and appeared to be in high spirits. 41.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0208JUD005585300

Admin. suprême

8 février 2005

8 février 2005

Until his retirement in March 1983 he worked as a teacher for 17 hours per week. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021JUD000954007

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

He told the trial court that he had completed his university studies and qualified as a teacher.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD002064105

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

    On 29 March 2002, under section 37 of Law no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0721JUD005840016

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2020

21 juillet 2020

    In the meantime, on 15 March 2018 the prison governor considered the need to change the applicant’s prison regime from the most stringent “special regime” to the lighter “severe regime”,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1205JUD001327408

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2019

5 décembre 2019

It was one of the articles written by the first applicant in a series of “East-West studies”.

Source officielle