CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1012DEC001889791
12 octobre 1992
of the Attorney General's claim on the merits against these newspapers.
Page 75 sur 145
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD001832619
8 juin 2023
Firstly, it was stated that the vacancy announcement did not state that any type of the candidates’ merits was to be given preference and that it was for the Council to assess their merits, that it was
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0831DEC005154399
31 août 2004
The applicant’s son had his permanent residence in Toronto (Canada) but, at that time, was staying and had an address in Slovakia as well.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0613JUD007763316
13 juin 2019
Accordingly, the court rejected the applicant’s request without examining the merits of the question of constitutionality raised by him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD005963209
18 juillet 2013
In her reply, dated 26 February 2008, the investigator did not address the question of confrontation. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD005851216
30 juin 2020
Merits Submissions by the parties 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223JUD001482402
23 février 2010
Merits 70.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0607JUD000721106
7 juin 2016
In this situation, the Minister found that it was not necessary to address the question of whether internal relocation would be a possibility.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC001325202
6 mars 2007
involvement of each of the participants in the group, tendentiously asserting that the police had targeted the Roma population when they were not influenced by the perpetrators’ ethnic affiliation, but merely
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0222JUD003501497
22 février 2005
The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0413JUD004596399
13 avril 2006
Neither the applicant, nor the Government filed additional observations on the merits. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329DEC000385314
29 mars 2016
Nevertheless, due to the prevailing attitudes in society persons could also be stigmatized by merely initiating criminal proceedings in respect of them.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607JUD003959498
7 juin 2001
The Court heard addresses by them. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0707JUD007228710
7 juillet 2015
It was also decided to examine the merits of the applications at the same time as their admissibility (former Article 29 § 3 of the Convention) and to grant the case priority under Rules 41 and 61 § 2(
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0308JUD005953200
8 mars 2006
Both the applicant and the Government filed observations on the admissibility and merits of the application. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0320JUD001268603
20 mars 2009
Merits 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0513JUD001900904
13 mai 2008
On 10 May 2005 the Chamber decided that the admissibility and merits of the case should be considered jointly (Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and Rule 54A).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0722JUD001898402
22 juillet 2010
The applicants and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1002JUD000174802
2 octobre 2008
Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD002258115
25 février 2020
Merits 45. The Court summarised the principles of confinement in glass cabins in Yaroslav Belousov (cited above, §§ 120-22).