On 25 August 2003 Mr V.M. was released from detention in Khatuni.

On 1 August 2019 the Radom Regional Court stayed the proceedings.

    On 18 August 2004 the applicant was committed to stand trial before the District Court. 18.

    On 5 August 2008 the United Kingdom Border Agency decided to deport the applicant.

The detention on 4 August 1989 39.

    On 23 August 2012 the applicant was examined by two experts who issued   forensic report no. 213 on 24 August 2012.

By a decision of 27 August 2010 the City Court dismissed the applicant organisation’s action as inadmissible for being time-barred. The applicant appealed.

On 11 July 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicants’ representative, inviting him to submit, by 22 August 2019, the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction.

On 1 August 2018 the Court sent a letter by registered mail to the applicant’s representative requesting her to send a copy of an authentic document issued by the domestic authorities certifying that the

On 3 August 2015 the applicant was found guilty of the administrative offence of “public activities aimed at the promotion of homosexuality among minors” and sentenced to a fine of 50,000 Russian roubles

    By letter of 7 August 2014, the applicant informed the Court that he wished to withdraw the application. 7.     Article 37 of the Convention provides as follows: “1.

    At 2.51 a.m. on 16 August 2020 the prison guards noticed that the applicant was performing Salah in his cell. 6.

The action started on 5 August. 2.

Following another judgment of the Constitutional Court, however, the transmission via cable of original programmes – active cable broadcasting – has been legal since 1   August 1996,   just as

Jacques BARRAL, de M. et Mme Auguste DUSSAP, de M. et Mme Michel LAVASTRE, de M.

2024 and 27 August 2024 respectively communicated on 16 September 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The first applicant is the director of a media company which owns the TV channel Correio da Manhã T.V.

During the court hearing on 5 August 2016 the applicant was again examined by doctor N. who noted general deterioration of her health condition in comparison to examination of 30 June 2016 (in particular

, the Government are invited to address the investigating judge’s request that the applicant’s medical expert be invited to submit observations (see, as an example, the decision issued on 22   August