CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199727
4 décembre 2019
21743/15 Nikolay Kostadinov KOSTADINOV against Bulgaria lodged on 30 April 2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns complaints that the procedures available under Bulgarian law, and the way
Page 74 sur 1364
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9672
2 juin 1993
notwithstanding the objections of the Delegate of the Commission, no public policy reasons of such a kind as to necessitate continuation of the proceedings, in view in particular of legislative reform under way
ECLI:CEDH:001-179148
8 novembre 2017
Was there a violation of Article 6 of the Convention on account of the quashing of the final acquittal in respect of the applicant by way of the review procedure under Article 30.12 of the
ECLI:CEDH:001-180777
19 janvier 2018
Did they consider the way in which the applicant should have become aware that the picture had been declared extremist?
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55452
21 juin 1988
unanimously held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention and that the respondent state was to pay to the applicant the sum of fifteen million Italian lire by way
ECLI:CEDH:001-55451
unanimously held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention and that the respondent state was to pay to the applicant the sum of seven million Italian lire by way
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD002446504
19 février 2009
On 14 October 1999 the District Court, by way of extraordinary review, adopted a judgment by which it quashed the fine as being time-barred, while leaving the confiscation order in force.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0528JUD000217304
28 mai 2014
Quashing by way of supervisory review 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212JUD001747204
12 février 2009
With reference to Articles 6, 13, 14 and 17 the applicant complained in substance about unfairness of the quashing of the judgment of 12 May 2003 by way of supervisory review.
ECLI:CEDH:001-162818
12 avril 2016
of 60 x 30 cm; since December 2015 he has been held in a cell of 12.5 sq. m for four people: the cell has a shower, a sink and a toilet which is separated from the beds by a wall of 60 x 30 cm.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0414REP001445188
14 avril 1994
On this occasion neither the window in the wall between Kjell Persson's room and the corridor nor the window in the door had any curtain.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC004521607
6 octobre 2009
Each school shall decide in what way this cooperation will be put into practice.
ECLI:CEDH:001-118184
30 août 2011
Accordingly, the applicant’s solicitor applied again for legal aid to challenge the inadequacy of the inquest by way of judicial review.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0906DEC001465489
6 septembre 1991
This way of proceeding has not previously led to any complication. Therefore, in the case at issue I did not issue any suspension order.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0117JUD007415301
17 janvier 2006
#xa0; The Court reiterates that a judgment in which it finds a breach imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation to put an end to the breach and make reparation for its consequences in such a way
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0210DEC005605400
10 février 2004
No appeal to the Crown Court against forfeiture by way of re-hearing was provided for under the 1990 Act.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527DEC001500822
27 mai 2025
By way of his Article 122 application, he had sought to assert his right of access to a court and had therefore benefited from the guarantees of Article 6 of the Convention. 29 .
Pôle 5 - Chambre 8
6163cfff74df0e9c0194f823
12 janvier 2010
64] représenté par la SCP FISSELIER - CHILOUX - BOULAY, avoués à la Cour assisté de Me Nicolas SIDIER, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : R.047 (SCP DEFLERS ANDRIEU & Associés) Société BY THE WAY
ECLI:CEDH:001-208739
19 février 2021
Spent convictions appear on ECRCs in the same way as unspent convictions. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0713DEC001246286
13 juillet 1987
#xa0; Apart from dividing the movable property the Court decided to transfer the applicant's title to the premises to his former wife, who was ordered to pay to the applicant the sum of 450.000 AS by way