Civil proceedings for damages on account of unlawful deprivation of liberty 4.

déférée à la Cour : Arrêt rendu par la Cour de Cassation le 06/03/2024, cassant un arrêt rendu par la Cour d'Appel de LIMOGES le 17/01/2022, statuant sur appel d'un jugement du tribunal judiciaire de LIBOURNE

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

xa0;     fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court, 16/03/2018 and 19/04/2018           St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty

    Article 18 § 1 of the Constitution states that the human liberty shall be inviolable. Under Article 18 § 6, the maximum period of pre-trial detention is nine months.

1°) d'annuler la décision du 29 août 2022 par laquelle la rectrice de l'académie de Bordeaux a rejeté sa demande tendant à l'inscription de sa fille C B en classe de seconde au lycée Max Linder de Libourne

Law : Article 5 § 1 (e) - The confinement amounted to a deprivation of liberty and the only ground invoked by the Government was "lawful detention of ... alcoholics".

Germany - 30060/04 Judgment 14.4.2011 [Section V] Article 5 Article 5-1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention Continued placement in preventive detention beyond maximum period authorised at

The applicant, a lawyer practising in Bucharest, was deprived of his liberty, presented to the public in handcuffs and information from the investigation file, including personal data such as his address

The decision-making process in matters where a person’s liberty was at stake should have taken into account all the relevant circumstances of the case.

Minute n° Notifiée le 07 janvier 2026 - Patient - Hopital - PR - Préfecture - tuteur / curateur - Me Marie BERGER-SOULET + 1 AFM COUR D’APPEL DE [Localité 5] TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE LIBOURNE ORDONNANCE

TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE LIBOURNE Numéro de rôle : 2025001560 JUGEMENT DU 14 avril 2025 ORDONNANT L'OUVERTURE DE LA PROCÉDURE DE REDRESSEMENT JUDICIAIRE SUR ASSIGNATION DE L'URSSAF AQUITAINE venant aux

[Adresse 4] assistée de Me Ahmad SERHAN, avocat au barreau de BORDEAUX Appelante d'un jugement (R.G. 2023-09843) rendu le 08 décembre 2023 par le Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire de LIBOURNE

    Did the applicant’s stay at the airport international transit zone amount to a deprivation of liberty (see Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no.

RAPPEL DE LA PROCEDURE Par actes reçus au Secrétariat-Greffe de la Juridiction de Proximité de Libourne, le prévenu, X...

Turkish authorities and the first applicant also lodged proceedings with the Turkish Constitutional Court to complain about his risk in case of removal to his country of origin, his deprivation of liberty

which they were unable to challenge effectively as the Austrian authorities had refused to acknowledge their stay in the transit zone as deprivation of liberty.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Grigoryev and Igamberdiyeva v.