The Supreme Social Insurance Court refused her leave to appeal.

    On 19 August 2010 the County Court applied interim measures. 30.

COUR D'APPEL DE BORDEAUX CHAMBRE SOCIALE - SECTION B -------------------------- ARRÊT DU : 10 DECEMBRE 2020 (Rédacteur : Madame Marie-Luce GRANDEMANGE, Présidente) PRUD'HOMMES N

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par M.

    On 22 May 2013 the Bucharest County Court (“the County Court”) found the applicant and his co-defendants guilty of the respective charges brought against them (see paragraph 6 above) and

Upon an appeal by the Split County State Attorney’s Office, the Supreme Court quashed that judgment on 5 December 2002.

On 29 September 2008, the High Court of Cassation and Justice upheld his request and the case was referred for retrial to the Bucharest County Court.

On the same day the County Court dismissed the applicants' claim.

  By two decisions of July 2000 given in last instance, the Bucharest County Court acquitted the journalists on the charges of insult and defamation and rejected the applicant’s civil claims.

By a further decision of 7   December 2016 the County Court awarded the applicant an additional HRK   5,716 in costs. 2.

On 12 February the Bacău Court of Appeal allowed the appeal lodged by the prosecutor, quashed the County Court’s decision and sent the case back to that court to continue the trial.

    After the criminal court’s judgment became final, on 19 March 2014 the file was forwarded to the Zagreb County Court (hereinafter “the County Court”) as the court with competence to rule

de la famille eussent pu vouloir faire porter la responsabilité de l'envoi sur la personne d' C... en imitant son écriture sur un courrier envoyé au vu de tous à l'école, la cour d'appel n'a pas donné

, dans ces circonstances, d'interpréter les termes du courrier susvisé pour déterminer qu'elle était l'intention réelle de l'intéressée lors de la rédaction de ce courrier ; qu&apos

On 1 March 2018 the City Court ( tingrett ) upheld the Board’s decision. On 7 June 2018 the High Court ( lagmannsrett ) refused the applicant leave to appeal against the City Court’s judgment.

  Article 6 § 1 of the Convention taken alone Reiteration of Court's case-law on concept of "impartial" tribunal.

The applicant appealed this judgment before the Zlatar County Court ( Županijski sud u Zlataru ) and on 16 September 2009 the Zlatar County Court dismissed her appeal as ill-founded upholding the first-instance

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu que M.

sent the case back to the County Court for a new examination. 6 .