CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

7 691 résultats pour « Chilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD000550420

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2022

14 juin 2022

    The Ombudsman for Children in the Tambov Region, the local Child Protection Department and the Centre for Assistance to Child and Family Protection were involved in facilitating the enforcement

Source officielle

Page 74 sur 385

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205606

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2020

1 octobre 2020

The District Court obliged O.I. to return the child to the second applicant and to pay child maintenance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922JUD001091920

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2022

22 septembre 2022

The child enjoyed communicating with the applicant on the rare occasions they met in 2017 and 2018 without the mother present.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10894

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2016

23 mars 2016

R (87) 20; Council of Europe Recommendation (2003)20; Council of Europe Guidelines on child friendly justice, Guidelines 1, 2, and 28-30; the Article 40 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113371

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2012

6 septembre 2012

On 23 June 2010 the Court of First Instance granted custody to the respondent and ordered the applicant to pay child maintenance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212DEC004701521

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2023

12 décembre 2023

    The applicant has one child (X, born in 2011) with A and two children (Y, born in 2012 and Z, born in 2014) with B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9320

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2014

7 janvier 2014

In April 1999 their first child was born.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13665

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2022

19 mai 2022

The child had been baptised in the Roman Catholic Church and had been brought up since her birth in a Catholic family and social environment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10162

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2014

9 septembre 2014

Switzerland - 43730/07 Judgment 9.9.2014 [Section II] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Opinion of 11 year old child not taken into account in return proceedings under Hague Convention: no

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0727JUD002073905

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2010

27 juillet 2010

decided; 3) the wishes and views of the child. ... 6. (...)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD007482601

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2005

24 novembre 2005

In particular, the child had the right under Article 8 to establish a legal relationship with his natural father ( Mikulić v. Croatia , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1024DEC003204096

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2000

24 octobre 2000

    The circumstances of the case The applicant had a relationship with a woman, Ms B., out of which a child, Rosa, was born on 11 October 1987. The applicant recognised Rosa as his child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC001264302

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2005

19 mai 2005

If the parents put the well-being of the minor child at risk, on account of their conduct, the court shall take the decisions necessary to ensure the well-being of the child, ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140902

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2014

13 janvier 2014

child of a parent who had been granted refugee status in the United Kingdom.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0312DEC003682521

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2024

12 mars 2024

    The application concerns child welfare measures, in particular proceedings in which it was decided not to lift a care order that had been issued in respect of the applicants’ child and in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212DEC004999321

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2023

12 décembre 2023

The second applicant is the father of X, who is his only child.

Source officielle
CA

6e Chambre C

6034eb75d6704d16fe96df1f

Appel

1 septembre 2016

1 septembre 2016

' CV établi au Chili par [N] [X]) pour un salaire de base de 1 050 000 CLP (1447€).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-148353

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2014

4 novembre 2014

right of contact with the child. (2)     The parents must refrain from everything that renders more difficult the relationship of the child to the other parent or the upbringing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229070

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2023

30 octobre 2023

This included individuals bringing up a child or children under the age of 18 on their own. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141742

Admin. suprême

13 février 2014

13 février 2014

state of health she would not be in a position to independently provide for the child and to ensure proper upbringing.

Source officielle