CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 292 résultats pour « Silbert »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0511DEC001651490

Admin. suprême

11 mai 1992

11 mai 1992

been informed about his right to refuse to make any statements, the Commission refers to its above findings and notes that the applicant's allegation that he was not informed about his right to remain silent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD005442414

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2019

17 décembre 2019

    It further notes that the material submitted by the Government remains silent as to what measures the domestic judicial authorities employed, apart from sending the summonses by post, to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC001262204

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2008

21 octobre 2008

In the present case there is no evidence that the applicant, who had the statutory right to remain silent, ever requested to see counsel (see Latimer v. the United Kingdom , dec., no   12141/04, 31

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0915DEC004638999

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2003

15 septembre 2003

Paarhammer did not even shrink from publicly criticising and disparaging the Pope in an extremely offensive manner, while Sieberer insulted Laun as soon as he was appointed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211DEC002369015

Admin. suprême

11 février 2020

11 février 2020

According to his discharge papers, he was diagnosed with high blood pressure (second degree) with a high risk of silent ischemia and with acute chronic gastritis.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1009DEC001587189

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 1991

9 octobre 1991

After having been informed about his right to remain silent, to have assistance by counsel or to request the taking of evidence, the applicant declared that, upon mature deliberation, he wanted to give

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0130DEC005017014

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2024

30 janvier 2024

    In the present case, there were no doubts that G.C., as a defendant, had the right to remain silent to the extent of his choosing, including refusing to answer questions from his co-defendants

Source officielle
CA

2e chambre civile

6528df76aaebb88318fda5ce

Appel

12 octobre 2023

12 octobre 2023

tranquillité ou celle des occupants et ne doit pas compromettre l'harmonie de l'immeuble, le cahier des charges précise que les climatiseurs sont tolérés sous réserve notamment : - qu'ils soient posés sur silent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180614

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2018

8 janvier 2018

Several new procedures aiming at simplifying and accelerating the proceedings were introduced, in particular: a “silent procedure” ( milczące załatwienie sprawy ), a simplified procedure (Articles 35 §

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cbcebd3db21cbdd8e53b

Appel

19 octobre 2010

19 octobre 2010

Elle admet avoir établi un devis d'adaptation mais qui n'a pas été suivi d'effets et indique que les travaux ont été réalisés par l'entreprise SIFFERT.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0201JUD000528906

Admin. suprême

1 février 2011

1 février 2011

    According to a form dated 9 July 2002 that explained arrested persons' rights, and which was signed by the applicant, he had been reminded of his right to remain silent. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1022DEC002115693

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1996

22 octobre 1996

Furthermore, the Government point out that the applicant remained silent for more than four years before complaining about the allegedly excessive length of the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD004010615

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2024

12 septembre 2024

    However, in the present case the Government have remained silent as to the existence of any such legitimate aim or the necessity of the interference complained of.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410DEC003810605

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

They first indicated that after having been duly apprised of his rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer, the applicant signed a written waiver of those rights and testified

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD000720312

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2018

11 décembre 2018

However, at the next hearing, held on 23   January 2009, he invoked his right to remain silent. 30.     On 23 January 2009 the trial court heard evidence from seven witnesses. 31.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620JUD006914601

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2006

20 juin 2006

Se référant à la décision rendue par la Cour le 25 mai 2004 dans l’affaire Siebert c.   Pologne , n o 40328/98, il soutient que M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD000415704

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2013

27 juin 2013

The decision was silent on the applicant’s arguments concerning the detention order of 15 April 2002. 17 .     On 15 January 2004 the criminal cases against the applicant were joined. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1021DEC002165693

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1996

21 octobre 1996

refer to the safeguards provided in Article 4 of the 1988 Criminal Evidence Order: no inference may be drawn unless the suspect/accused has been warned in advance of the possible effects of remaining silent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD001640403

Admin. suprême

19 février 2009

19 février 2009

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that his conviction for the murder of Mrs K. was based on incriminating evidence obtained in violation of his right to remain silent and the privilege

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0507JUD004804009

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2020

7 mai 2020

    At 9.45   a.m. on the same date the applicant signed a two-page document explaining to him the procedural rights of the accused, including the right to remain silent and to be represented

Source officielle

Page 73 sur 115

← PrécédentSuivant →