CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 899 résultats pour « Merrily ADRASSE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD002019092

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 1995

22 novembre 1995

The Court heard addresses by Mr Mucha, Mr Hill and Mr Moses and also replies to questions put by some of its members individually. AS TO THE FACTS I.

Page 73 sur 145

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0121JUD002571694

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 1999

21 janvier 1999

The Government maintain however that the guards, who were acting on sanitary and traffic considerations, merely requested the vendors to move to a nearby market-place.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1023JUD001596390

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1995

23 octobre 1995

The Court heard addresses by Mr Weitzel, Mr Fiebinger and Mr Cede.   AS TO THE FACTS   I.    CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE   6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0205JUD007442001

Admin. suprême

5 février 2008

5 février 2008

    The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0731JUD000026507

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2008

31 juillet 2008

The first applicant had not gone under ground but had stayed at a permanent address that was known to the authorities all the time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0522JUD000880579

Admin. suprême

22 mai 1984

22 mai 1984

The Court heard addresses by Mrs. van der Wal and Mr. Droogleever Fortuijn for the Government, by Mr. Frowein for the Commission and by Mr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0802JUD000869179

Admin. suprême

2 août 1984

2 août 1984

The Court heard addresses by Sir Michael Havers for the Government, by Mr. Nørgaard for the Commission and by Mr. Ross-Munro for the applicant, as well as their replies to its questions. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0425JUD006969801

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2006

25 avril 2006

These documents, they argue, merit greater protection than, for instance, expert reports or minutes of parliamentary committees.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC004095707

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

However, the underlying refusal in Hill’s case to recognise a duty of care when the police merely exercise their public functions was upheld.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD003061406

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2011

26 juillet 2011

    Merits 1.     The parties’ arguments 31.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208JUD004915107

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

An ethnic group, moreover, is merely a group which is differentiated on grounds of race ... and a rite is merely a custom or ceremony. ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116762

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

It found that in its decision of 27 January 2009 the Samara Town Administration had merely suggested that the applicant should change the location and time of the picket rather than imposed a ban on it

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0306JUD003153509

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2014

6 mars 2014

    The prison personnel continued to address the applicant’s complaints whenever he had any.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD006150314

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2017

1 juin 2017

Article 126 § 4 of the CCP did not exclude a challenge for bias, except when it was merely argued with the fact that the expert had been appointed previously in the preliminary proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD000891805

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2016

22 novembre 2016

    Merits 1.     Existence of interference 46.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD006658311

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2014

9 janvier 2014

According to their findings, the applicant did not need surgical treatment or radiotherapy, merely requiring supervision by a neurologist and correct anticonvulsive medication. 56.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0315JUD000414904

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2012

15 mars 2012

    The applicant and the Government each filed further observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD004285705

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2012

3 avril 2012

It also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (former Article 29 § 3). 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD001943307

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2012

31 juillet 2012

    Merits 1.     General principles 63.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD000445510

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2014

27 mai 2014

    The applicant and the Government each filed further observations (Rule 59 § 1) on the merits. 9.

Source officielle