Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243412
30 avril 2025
30 avril 2025
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217187
6 avril 2022
6 avril 2022
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his medical condition, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Articles
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225564
30 mai 2023
30 mai 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private and/or family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223081
19 janvier 2023
19 janvier 2023
Has the applicant been subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223237
24 janvier 2023
24 janvier 2023
Should the answer to the above question be in the affirmative, has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216000
1 février 2022
1 février 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see Braun v. Poland , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216012
1 février 2022
1 février 2022
Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention, on account of his alleged ill-treatment by the police
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118108
4 mars 2013
4 mars 2013
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228980
26 octobre 2023
26 octobre 2023
If so, has the applicant been tried twice for the same offence contrary to Article 4 § 1 of Protocol No. 7?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193402
25 avril 2019
25 avril 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228823
9 octobre 2023
9 octobre 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, Campbell v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220308
27 septembre 2022
27 septembre 2022
Has the applicant been treated differently from other persons in an analogous or relevantly similar situation in the enjoyment of this Convention rights due to his “other status”, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13979
13 décembre 2022
13 décembre 2022
registration act with the Supreme Administrative Court, relying on Article 13 of the Constitution or directly on the Convention, which, pursuant to Article 28 of the Constitution, prevailed over any contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146442
25 août 2014
25 août 2014
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his re-employment in the public sphere, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199355
19 novembre 2019
19 novembre 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention (see Bukta and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11431
7 mars 2017
7 mars 2017
Law – Article 35 § 3 (a): In principle any conduct on the part of an applicant that is manifestly contrary to the purpose of the right of individual application as provided for in the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1541
12 mai 2009
12 mai 2009
To admit the contrary would amount to the exclusion of minority religious beliefs which were not formally registered with the State, which, in turn, would mean that the State could dictate what a person
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209117
9 mars 2021
9 mars 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination on account of her sex, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4116
2 novembre 2004
2 novembre 2004
Moreover, the fact that the Supreme Court had held that the jurisdiction of the courts was excluded in relation to certain civil disputes was contrary to the right of access to a court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197193
3 octobre 2019
3 octobre 2019
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and/or family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officiellePage 73 sur 1005