Conclusioni dell'avvocato generale Darmon del 21 aprile 1994. # Parlamento europeo contro Mireille Meskens. # Ricorso contro una sentenza del Tribunale di primo grado - Dipendenti - Mancata esecuzione

Beschikking van de president van het Hof van 22 april 1994.#Commissie van de Europese Gemeenschappen tegen Koninkrijk België.

Sentenza della Corte del 6 aprile 1995.#Radio Telefis Eireann (RTE) e Independent Television Publications Ltd (ITP) contro Commissione delle Comunità europee.

In so doing it relied on its decision of 2 April 2010 (see paragraph 6 above) as the enforcement title. 10.

    On 20 April 2010 the applicant addressed a letter to F.Z., containing her proposals and comments regarding “the two contracts and their annexes attached to [the letter of 19 April 2010]”.

a été validé par APRIL.

The decision was upheld on appeal on 27 April 2012.   38170/12 04/06/2012 Jalal Muzaffar oglu GARAYEV 1964 Baku   Arrested on 7 April 2012.

of 17 April 2011.

    The applicant’s administrative arrest on 19 April 1997 12.

her civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in view of the fact that on 17 June 2010 the Leninskiy District Court of Grozniy quashed the final judgment of 3 April

domicilié [Adresse 6], a formé le pourvoi n° K 23-14.959 contre l'arrêt rendu le 22 février 2023 par la cour d'appel d'Agen (chambre civile, 1re chambre), dans le litige l'opposant : 1°/ à la société April

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2002)50 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 April

On 17 April 2013 the Constitutional Court declared a constitutional complaint by the applicant inadmissible on the grounds that there was “no constitutional issue” to be examined.

s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     Resolution ResDH(2000)128 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 4 April

Croatia , no. 51198/08, § 88, 25 April 2013; Lucà v.   Italy , no. 33354/96, §§ 40-44, ECHR 2001-II and compare with Dominka v. Slovakia , no. 14630/12, §§ 28-36, 3 April 2018).

In particular, on 18   February 2011 the Sumy Regional Court of Appeal extended it to nine months (until 25 April 2011).

Under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention, the applicant complains about the outcome of the proceedings initiated on 11 April 2018 and which gave rise to the final decision of 20 April 2023.

    On 24 April 2004, at 12.15 p.m., the applicant was examined by a forensic medical expert. The applicant reported that he had been beaten by the police officers on 22 April 2004.