CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD006311709
3 juillet 2014
relatif à l’évaluation de la crédibilité de F.B. et de S.D. et de la fiabilité de leur déposition, ou à d’éventuels motifs qui auraient pu les amener à faire un faux témoignage (voir, a contrario , Sievert
Page 72 sur 115
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0828DEC002503813
28 août 2018
Dans une telle hypothèse, la présence du bâtonnier est considérée comme une garantie spéciale de procédure ( Xavier Da Silvera, précité, § 41).
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:C100114
31 janvier 2018
Les caractéristiques techniques indiquées dans les annexes mentionnées comme constitutives de la convention sont la présence d'un onduleur de marque SIEMENS de 160 kV SINVERT.
4ème chambre
DCA_23NT01974_20241213
13 décembre 2024
Par des mémoires, enregistrés le 25 janvier 2024 et le 1er mars 2024, la société Blanloeil, représentée par Me Siebert, demande à la cour d'infirmer le jugement attaqué en ce qu'il l'a condamnée, de rejeter
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2655848-2888356
27 février 2009
It was found that, despite the fact that the applicant had been informed at the beginning of his trial of his right to remain silent and that all his earlier statements could not be used as evidence against
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2420000-2629792
24 juillet 2008
The Court noted that the decisions of the domestic courts were almost completely silent on the question whether the applicant was personally and directly implicated in the events of Mazie Bati.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0509DEC001977492
9 mai 1994
The Commission recalls that the Court has confirmed that Article 5 para. 1 (a) (Art. 5-1-a) which is silent as to the permissible forms of legal machinery whereby
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0910DEC007657401
10 septembre 2002
The right not to incriminate oneself is primarily concerned, however, with respecting the will of an accused person to remain silent in the context of criminal proceedings and the use made of compulsorily
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC003437397
16 avril 1998
However, he chose to remain silent. It follows that the applicant has failed to exhaust domestic remedies under Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159002
5 novembre 2015
The court remained silent about the applicant’s handcuffing during the pronouncement of the judgment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0105DEC002324313
5 janvier 2016
The right served to ensure that statements are made freely, with the knowledge of the right to remain silent, without threats and promises, violence or abuse.
ECLI:CEDH:001-169046
3 novembre 2016
In each case, after that statement, an arrest record was drawn up, the applicant received status of a criminal suspect and was informed of all his rights, including the right to remain silent, the right
ECLI:CEDH:001-175532
20 juin 2017
However, at the next hearing, held on 23 January 2009, he invoked his right to remain silent. On 23 January 2009 the trial court heard seven witnesses.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326DEC006476612
26 mars 2019
But his application form is silent on that point. In it, he stated that there was no proof in the domestic file that the High Court’s decision of 14 December 2011 had been sent to him.
ECLI:CEDH:001-177236
30 août 2017
Do not be silent! Do not surrender!’ Those calls are addressed to the Crimean residents to incite them to commit unlawful actions.” 4.
DELIBERE CONTENTIEUX
69fdb50bcdc6046d4707f824
5 mai 2026
Composition du tribunal lors des débats et du délibéré : Président : THOMAS Emmanuel Juges : MEUNIER Sébastien, SCHILDKNECHT Stéphane, BOUCQ Silvère CLAUS Patrick Assistés lors des débats par Me Valérie
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516JUD000902809
16 mai 2024
Nevertheless, the domestic courts’ judgments remained silent in respect of the arguments raised by the applicant newspaper in that respect.
ECLI:CEDH:001-112193
26 juin 2012
According to the applicant, following his arrest, the Security Service officers did not inform his relatives about the applicant’s and his son’s detention, did not explain the applicant his right to remain silent
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1009DEC001392488
9 octobre 1991
It appears that from that moment the applicant chose to remain silent until the end of the trial.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116632
17 janvier 2013
Moreover, the applicant had used his right to remain silent during the investigation and had not participated in any investigating actions such as cross examinations.