CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0323DEC001280909
23 mars 2010
14.8pt } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 12809/09 by Vesa AALTO and Others against Finland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23 March
Page 72 sur 79
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0624DEC007288101
24 juin 2004
Pursuant to Decree of the President no. 310 of 23 March 1995 ‘On Measures to Secure Co-ordinated Actions by State Authorities in the Fight against Fascism and Other Forms of Political Extremism in the
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1221JUD005556500
21 décembre 2006
On 17 March 1997 the Head of the Passports and Visas Service refused the applicant’s request.
CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;OPINIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-6380464-8364383
10 avril 2019
Ranzoni, Georges Ravarani, Pauliine Koskelo, Tim Eicke, Péter Paczolay, Lado Chanturia, judges , and Roderick Liddell, Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 20 March
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC003121196
2 juillet 1997
On 4 March 1994 the applicant was interviewed at the police station.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0327JUD002045892
27 mars 1998
Marxer , Delegate ; (c) for the applicant Mr A. Laimer , of the Vienna Bar, Counsel . The Court heard addresses by Mr Marxer, Mr Laimer and Mr Okresek.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605JUD005455811
5 juin 2018
xa0; 5539) in force at the material time, the General Directorate was tasked not only with the construction and repair of roads, but also with taking measures to ensure their safe use and conducting studies
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207394
11 décembre 2020
On 9 March 2018 the applicant was heard in person by the Regional Court and stated that he regretted the offence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207DEC003785714
7 décembre 2021
72286/01, §§ 58 - 60, 28 March 2006; and Nold v. Germany , no. 27250/02, § 87, 29 June 2006). 30.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0428DEC004404719
28 avril 2020
On 21 March 2017 the Ministry of Justice forwarded a proposal to the Police and Border Guard Board ( Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet – hereinafter “the PBGB”) to have the applicant’s residence
ECLI:CEDH:001-138914
4 novembre 2013
It also referred to the judgment of the Proletarskiy District Court of Rostov-on-Don of 19 March 2001 convicting two officials of theft of 128 handguns from the arms storage of the North Caucasus Directorate
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0329JUD004934118
29 mars 2022
Les articles 104 et 105 de ce règlement, publié au Journal officiel le 29 mars 2020, reprennent essentiellement le texte des articles 122 et 123 du règlement du 20 mars 2006. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0202JUD004243005
2 février 2010
Belgique (déc.), n o 73511/01, 9 mars 2006, et Sture Stigson c. Suède , n o 12264/86, décision de la Commission du 13 juillet 1988, Décisions et rapports 57, p. 131).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0408DEC002109692
8 avril 1993
MARXER G.B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD003469005
21 décembre 2010
On 23 March 2005 the Supreme Court of Justice upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal but reduced the amount awarded in respect of compensation for non-pecuniary damage from MDL 12,000
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215DEC000300706
15 décembre 2009
(by Ms Magidova), consisting of a photocopy of an empty icon frame with the road sign symbolising danger (an exclamation mark in a red triangle) inside; – twelve copies of the same frame
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1209DEC002941995
9 décembre 1997
They rely on the case of Van Marle v. Netherlands (Eur.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC002611395
23 octobre 1997
On 9 March 1993, the Vienna Public Prosecutor's Office (Staatsanwaltschaft), referring to S. 34 para. 3 of the Media Act, made a request to the Vienna Regional Criminal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0629DEC001679290
29 juin 1992
MARXER Mr. H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1211REP001377888
11 décembre 1990
The hearing took place on 14 March 1990. The applicant was present in person and was represented by Mr. Tómas Gunnarsson as counsel.