A compulsory portion is half the value of the share of the inheritance on intestacy. B.     Rules of succession 34.

Relying on the restitutio in integrum principle, she requested that Demirbank be returned to its previous owners.

She requested that her case be decided on the basis of these materials together with the medical opinions which she had previously submitted. 9.

Between 1997 and 2001 the majority of its shares were privatised. After the privatisation the company was named Duni AD. 6.

Later that month V.T. went to London alone, told the applicant that their relationship was over, took her belongings and, having said that she was not going to share the child’s care until the boy was

Being a sportsperson and non-smoker, he could not be expected to share a cell with smokers.” 16.

She added that she had no reason to suspect anyone with regard to her children’s disappearance. 10.

  It owns all shares of another limited liability company named Giallo Aktiebolag (hereinafter "Giallo").   6.

   Particular circumstances of the case        By charge sheet dated 16 September 1994 the applicant, then a non-commissioned officer in the British army stationed in

    On 3 December 2002, after an exchange of correspondence, the Registrar suggested to the parties that they should attempt to reach a friendly settlement within the meaning of Article 38 §

published a Report (“the Report”) prepared by Inspectors appointed by the Department of Trade and Industry under sections 432(2) and 442 of the Companies Act 1985 to investigate allegations of an unlawful share

2009, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, whose particulars are set out in the appendix, were represented before the Court by Mr Mustafa Göncü, a lawyer practising in Mersin

He indicated, in particular, that he had had to share cells with inmates suffering from tuberculosis.

That counter-claim was subsequently pursued by five individuals, former shareholders of company “N.Z.”, who claimed the title to the lorry in question as an equivalent to their shares’ value.

The applicants share a plot of land and a house with another family (hereinafter: the neighbours).

    On 1 October 1996 the applicant informed the District Court that she wished to join the affiliation proceedings brought on 5 August 1996.

she had committed money laundering.

The Government had confined themselves to emphasising the applicant’s share of responsibility in the matter by failing to register himself in the civil status register until 1986.

At first the applicant attempted to cover Ms Z., but she voluntarily reported her actions to the investigating authorities.