Poland (dec.), no. 41413/98, 5 April 2001). 47.

Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 36-42). The Government did not plead that the applicant had failed to exhaust the domestic remedies.

Jean-Louis ROUDIL, Président Mme Christine AUBRY, Conseiller Madame Sylvie BONNIN, Conseiller GREFFIER : Madame Sylvie BERTHIOT, Greffier, lors des débats et Madame Nicole GUIRAUD, Greffier, lors

Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, §§   82-83, ECHR 2001-VIII; Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no.   39794/98, § 69, ECHR 2002-VII; and Kopecký v.

DECISION Application no. 32494/05 by Viera ZEMANOVÁ against Slovakia The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 11   September 2007 as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas

  Poland (dec.), no.   15212/03, ECHR 2005 ‑ ...; Majewski v. Poland , no.   52690/99, 11   October 2005; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no.

  Slovakia (dec.), no. 23788/06, 18   September 2007). 21.     The proceedings started on 14 May 1993 and are still pending before the first-instance court.

Poland , (dec.), no.   41413/98, 5 April 2001). In these circumstances, the Court finds that the applicant’s actions contributed to prolonging the proceedings.

  Poland (dec.), no.   38665/97, 11   June   2002). The Court observes that the applicants have not contested the availability of the remedies relied on by the Government.

Germany (dec.), no. 55899/00, 25 April 2002).

SECTION DECISION Application no. 21136/03 by Natalia FILIMONOVA against Moldova The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 19   January 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Nicolas

  Latvia (dec.), no.   73485/01, 10 January 2012).

  Espagne , (dec.), n o   41785/02, 17   février 2004).

Daniszewska-Dek, avocate à Białystok. Le gouvernement polonais («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent, M. J. Wołąsiewicz, du Ministère des affaires étrangères. 3.

Slovakia (dec.), no. 47804/99, 13 September 2001, unreported). It sees no reason for reaching a different conclusion in the present case.

  Serbia (dec.), no.   18369/07, 4   March 2008). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

  Cyprus (dec.), no.   73802/01, 13   November 2003). 21.     Accordingly, the Court rejects the Government's preliminary objection.

  Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-...; Barszcz   v.   Poland, no. 71152/01, §§ 41-45, 30 May 2006).

  Slovakia (dec.), no. 23788/06, 18   September 2007). 20.