on 15 October 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

that Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention was applicable;     - held that there had been a violation of that provision as regards the "reasonable time" requirement;   &#

that there had been violations of Article 5, paragraph 3, Article 3 and Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 5-3, art. 3, art. 6-1);        - held that the respondent state was to pay

The Federal Minister further held that it had not been necessary to hold a hearing because a hearing was only held if a decision was taken by a panel on an appeal against the decision of a tax office or

a letter of the President of the Commission dated 20 July 1998;   Whereas at the 640th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the Commission’s proposals, held

on 5 December 1994 the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 9 November 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 18 October 1991, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

These sums include value-added tax (VAT). 43.

Conditions of detention The applicant suffers from astigmatism since his childhood. In 1995 he contracted tuberculosis.

It further held that each party to the proceedings should cover their own trial costs.

placed in a 7m² cell with 12 other detainees, which had no drinking water or access to water for washing and that he caught microbic eczema and scabies because the cell was infested with bedbugs and head

It held that the applicant’s financial situation was good since she had already received PLN 300,000 from her husband on the basis of a lump sum order made in the proceedings concerning the division of

  208 of Daugavgrīva Prison held ten people instead of five which could “realistically be held there”. The applicant claimed that the situation in other cells was not different.

For three hundred and eighty-two days he was held therein with four other inmates with 3.27 square metres of personal space and for one hundred days he was held therein with five other inmates with 2.73

    A hearing was held on 4 May 2000.

had to rapidly boost Natalia Vitrenko’s ratings to ‘help her get into the second round of the elections ’ [1.6]”. Second Article: “ Provocation Is the Mother of the Revolution?

that the applicant church validly applied to the Commission through Bishop Papamanolis; - held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held that there had been

Indeed, the authorities, medical and social, had a duty to protect children and could not be held liable every time genuine and reasonably-held concerns about the safety of children in their families were