CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

47 968 résultats pour « Ducuing »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110129

Admin. suprême

9 février 2012

9 février 2012

During the trial the applicant acknowledged that he shared communist beliefs with the other co-defendants, whom he considered political comrades.

Source officielle

Page 71 sur 2399

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110134

Admin. suprême

6 février 2012

6 février 2012

During the trial, the applicant acknowledged that he had supported revolutionary communist views and had taken part in some unspecified “expropriations” of property for revolutionary purposes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0330DEC007071112

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2021

30 mars 2021

THE LAW Handcuffing during the applicant’s transportation 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD002817310

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

During the visit, eight detainees were being held in cell no. 38, which measured 24 square metres.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177767

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2017

22 septembre 2017

During the search the officers found two small packets containing white powder (later identified as amphetamine).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006JUD005965300

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

    As to the applicants' right to legal assistance during police custody 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC002213405

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2017

21 novembre 2017

    During the trial the applicant’s co-accused challenged the records of the applicant’s interviews of 19 March 2002 as inadmissible evidence, arguing that no lawyer had been present during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0201JUD000528906

Admin. suprême

1 février 2011

1 février 2011

During the proceedings, the applicant was represented by his lawyer, and he denied his police statement alleging that it had been extracted under duress.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC005171413

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

The applicant also sustained injuries while a standard restraint technique was applied against him during the arrest. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC002551415

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2016

13 décembre 2016

Thus, anything that may be of value as evidence in a case may, in principle, be presented during the main hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1206JUD000346820

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2022

6 décembre 2022

Some applications also concern the authorities’ decision to prohibit telephone calls during the weekends and the failure to notify the applicants of the public prosecutor’s opinion during proceedings concerning

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912JUD001044312

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2023

12 septembre 2023

The footage also shows that pressurised water was sprayed more than once during the intervention. 39 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110DEC000031509

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

The videotaped police interviews with A. were shown during the hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606JUD000228221

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2024

6 juin 2024

Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning detention in a metal cage during court hearings; Korshunov v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002564894

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

During the trial the prosecution relied on certain statements made by the applicant during his questioning by police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2881

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2007

11 janvier 2007

The applicant alleged that he had been ill-treated during his arrest, while being transported to the detention centre and during police custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC003296706

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2014

6 mai 2014

1 year, 10 months and 17 days from 2 July 2005”; (b)   EUR   2,480 to Mr   ISEKENOV for his detention on remand “during 1   year, 3 months and 22 days from 20 March 2009”; and (c)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188063

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2018

5 novembre 2018

The application also concerns the use of the first and the fifth applicants’ police statements allegedly obtained under ill-treatment to convict them and the alleged absence of the applicants’ lawyer during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-152795

Admin. suprême

9 février 2015

9 février 2015

During the investigation the police conducted search and seizure of T.M.’s premises where they found, inter alia , several pieces of automatic rifles and a number of mobile phones and condoms.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122649

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2013

19 juin 2013

On 20 January 2005, during the detention hearing before the Irbit District Court in the presence of the applicant’s counsel, the applicant retracted his confession.

Source officielle