He further complained that he had not been able fully to consult the case-file and that an expert opinion had been refused concerning the value of certain shares.

    The Court notes that the application is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.

However, the Civil Court could not share this opinion.

Consequently, the Commission finds that the second applicant cannot be considered a victim within the meaning of Article 25 (Art. 25) of the Convention.

  the person committed a further crime, also punishable with imprisonment, during the proceedings, or there is a serious risk that he or she might complete the crime which he or she prepared or attempted

It had been impossible for him to cancel his business meeting in Estonia at such short notice.

The opinion also stated that she had a paranoid personality and that she had understood her acts at the time of the commission of the alleged offence.

    In the resumed proceedings, on 29 August 2000 the Regional Court ordered the respondents to buy out the applicant's share of property. 10.

    On 10 October 2002 the court gave a partial decision, holding that the plaintiff had a ¼-share in the parties' flat. This decision was served on the applicant on 27 November 2002. 7.

    Did the applicants have a fair trial within the meaning of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention? In particular; a.

The first and the second applicant, who live on the shores of Lake Constance, further referred to risks stemming from the increased contamination of the lake water with cyanobacteria.

    Did the applicant have a fair trial within the meaning of Article 6 §   1 of the Convention?

          In the prison of Lagonegro, the applicant was confined to an isolation cell which on the first day he had to share with another prisoner.

The applicants' properties' total share of the costs was fixed at 13.7 per cent.

By charge sheet dated 16 June 1992 the applicant was charged, pursuant to section 70 of the Army Act 1955, with unlawful possession of a controlled drug contrary to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.

    The Court concludes that these complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention.

The court specified that the right was limited to the right to fish from the shore, without using boats or platforms. In addition, the fishermen had to respect the fish-protection periods. 8.

  1, 8 and 13, finding that they had been coerced into ceding their shares in Tbilaviamsheni. 7.

Subsequently, in 2002 the authorities declared that the properties were to be scheduled and considered as a “white area”, meaning property which can only be developed restrictively.

  The applicant claimed that she had not been able to return to Zadar given the war in Croatia and because she had no money, no medical insurance and was in poor health.