4 of the 1972 Rules). 21.

    In their relevant parts, Rules 62 and 62A of the Rules of Court read as follows: Rule 62 “1.

would represent her (Rule 30).

It referred to the procedural steps taken in the proceedings and found no violation of the rules of procedure as specified in the Act and the Rules by either the Commission or the SBP (paragraphs 21 &#

    The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule   52   §   1 of the Rules of Court).

  Levits (Rule 26 §   1   (b)). 5.

In her letter she also made reference to the interim measure indicated by the Court on 16 June 2017 under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. 11.

39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to give priority to the application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court.

    The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule   52   §   1 of the Rules of Court).

    The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule   52 §   1 of the Rules of Court).

that the Civil Chamber’s judges who had examined its case, had been appointed by the President of Poland upon the NCJ’s recommendation in manifest breach of the domestic law and the principles of the rule

The special characteristics of each person or each group of persons may reasonably justify the application of different rules of law (...)” 14.

PREMIÈRE CHAMBRE CIVILE -------------------------- ARRÊT DU : 23 JANVIER 2023 N° RG 20/00883 - N° Portalis DBVJ-V-B7E-LO3P SCI XVII c/ [Y] [Z] SCP GILLES DUTOUR, CYRILLE DE RUL

In the present case, the applicant does not criticise the existing rules, but complains that they do not appear on measures which are open to challenge, and thus claims guarantees in addition to those

  11108/23 Radu Grigoryevich PELIN against Russia PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the application on 7 March 2024, the Court decided, under Rule

and RUTAR MARKETING d.o.o. against Slovenia lodged on 11 May 2020 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns minor offence proceedings for the violation of the Consumer Protection Act, during

    The application was allocated to the Fourth Section of the Court (Rule   52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). 6.

As a result, for the time being, the application of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court comes to an end. C.

    The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule   52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).