CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

90 896 résultats pour « Fron »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606JUD002462505

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2017

6 juin 2017

Accordingly the decision to remove [the applicant] from the courtroom was justified.

Source officielle

Page 70 sur 4545

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159290

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2015

16 novembre 2015

    From 2006 onwards the applicant was wanted on suspicion of robbery. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211989

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2021

1 septembre 2021

from its nineteen gas extraction wells.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0504JUD002888395

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2001

4 mai 2001

The front passenger was Toman and in the rear seat was Burns.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD000541815

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2022

7 juillet 2022

In some cases, they actually prevented people who had fallen overboard from climbing on board the PLS   136.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD001811406

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2014

3 juillet 2014

    On 18 and 19 May 2002 the investigators searched Marx Street and collected cartridges from airguns and pellets. Pellets were also extracted from the applicant’s wounds. 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922JUD004341106

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2020

22 septembre 2020

As far as can be seen from the copy, the first applicant told the expert that on 27   May 2004 he had been abducted from his home by armed men and taken to the Leninskiy ROVD, where he had been ill

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0620JUD001381209

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2017

20 juin 2017

Nor had he received any written authorisation from the applicant for its use.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-185443

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2018

12 juillet 2018

The front page also included the applicant’s photograph.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD000204006

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

    From the information submitted by the applicant it appears that during 2008 E. was subjected again to a psychological evaluation by experts from social services.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0523DEC002580194

Admin. suprême

23 mai 1996

23 mai 1996

Some of the women and children were left in front of their homes and others were in the open, away from the village. The applicant was in the open. Smoke started to come from the village.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC004551809

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

All charges stemming from the events of 5 July 1998 made against this accused were added to this set of proceedings. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157463

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2015

3 septembre 2015

and from 10 to 16 December 2004 respectively (first-instance judgment, p. 67).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163134

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2016

25 avril 2016

From the enclosed documents, it can be seen that within the period from 20 July 2005 until 6 November 2011, the applicant filed 13 different claims and appeals to the prison warden, the Directorate for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0205JUD000463508

Admin. suprême

5 février 2019

5 février 2019

from the military commander’s office implicated in the shooting.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-139863

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2013

2 décembre 2013

transport to and from the courthouse.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222472

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2022

12 décembre 2022

The police also looked through surveillance materials from the area, but found no sign of Narek Sardaryan. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC002645295

Admin. suprême

16 avril 1998

16 avril 1998

   Under Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention the applicants also complain of the undue length of the proceedings, lasting from 8 July 1985 until 30 August 1994.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC004218698

Admin. suprême

24 août 1999

24 août 1999

Erm you do the front and then you do the back, O: Mm. H: and then sometimes you do the front as well and I feel like it's causing me to - O: Infection. H: Yeah.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0426JUD004210402

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2007

26 avril 2007

At the same hearing, the court took statements from the prison officers who were involved in the incident. 13.

Source officielle