Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212DEC007329901
12 décembre 2002
12 décembre 2002
It reiterated the trial judge’s remarks and stated: “So far as that is concerned, the applicant contends that the imposition of an automatic life sentence, pursuant to the then current Act was contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0507DEC001810191
7 mai 1993
7 mai 1993
The applicants complain under Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention that they would be subjected to treatment contrary to that provision if they were expelled to Sri Lanka.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0830DEC002138793
30 août 1994
30 août 1994
He complains that in prison his life was put at risk, contrary to Article 2 of the Convention, and that he was subjected to torture contrary to Article 3 in aversion therapy which consisted of electric
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126484
30 août 2013
30 août 2013
Contrary to the requirements of Article 59.3, the applicants were not informed in advance of the time and place of the examination of the signature lists and their presence was not ensured.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2651496-2884977
19 février 2009
19 février 2009
He complains principally that, notwithstanding assurances to the contrary from the Jordanian Government, if deported to that country he is at real risk of being subjected to ill-treatment in breach of
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6680
14 mars 2000
14 mars 2000
In both cases, the appellate courts found the method to be contrary to Article 29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which prohibits the exertion of pressure on suspects, and incompatible with the requirements
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-191383
6 février 2019
6 février 2019
In the light of the applicants’ claims and the available information, did/would the applicants’ forcible removal to Turkey expose them to a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205114
15 septembre 2020
15 septembre 2020
; Were the restrictions imposed by the State in the present case, purportedly pursuant to Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by those provisions, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200390
18 décembre 2019
18 décembre 2019
Have the applicants suffered discrimination, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention (see mutatis mutandis D.H. and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141427
1 février 2014
1 février 2014
Was there a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention, regard being had to his complaints of having been beaten up by the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187145
29 septembre 2018
29 septembre 2018
Did the applicant companies suffer discrimination in the enjoyment of their property rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184760
26 juin 2018
26 juin 2018
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights on the ground of her place of residence, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182809
10 avril 2018
10 avril 2018
(b) In the negative, was the failure of those courts to address their arguments contrary to the applicants’ right to a reasoned judgment, implied in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187876
29 octobre 2018
29 octobre 2018
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his “home”, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, inter alia, Buck v. Germany , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179795
29 novembre 2017
29 novembre 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Have there been violations of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression and/or right to peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 10 and/or Article 11 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179695
29 novembre 2017
29 novembre 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207900
14 janvier 2021
14 janvier 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, with regard to the manner in which the authorities responded
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210802
2 juin 2021
2 juin 2021
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 6 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206284
21 octobre 2020
21 octobre 2020
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention ?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188241
15 novembre 2018
15 novembre 2018
Was the applicant deprived of his liberty merely on the ground of his inability to fulfil a contractual obligation, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention?
Source officiellePage 70 sur 1005