The applicants raised their complaints under Article   3, Article 5 §§ 1, 2, 3 and 4, Article 8 and Article 13 of the Convention. 3.

It raises issues under Article   3 and Article 5 §§ 1, 2 and 4 and Article 13 of the Convention. THE FACTS 2.

    There has accordingly been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention in the instant case. 2.     Alleged violation of Article 5 § 2 of the Convention 41.

They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 1 “1.     Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

Further, the applicants complained under Article 5 §§   1   (f), 2 and 4 of the Convention about their detention by the Cypriot authorities.

Further, the applicant complained under Article 5 §§   1   (f), 2 and 4 of the Convention about his detention by the Cypriot authorities.

The Government challenged the applicability of Article   18, arguing that his arrest and detention had been effected for the sole purpose of Article   5.

somme « 15 915,19 € », - à l'article 5, 2/, la somme de « 9 450,36 € » est remplacée par la somme « 9 761,26 € » et la mention « frais d'opposition : 310,91 € » est ajoutée - dit que l'état de collocation

Article 13 in conjunction with Articles   2 and   3: The applicant’s complaints under Articles   2 and 3 had been arguable, so he could rely on Article   13.

Further, the applicant complained under Article 5 §§   1   (f), 2 and 4 of the Convention about his detention by the Cypriot authorities.

    The applicant and the Government each filed written observations (Rule 54 § 2 (b)). 5.

Italie - 16483/12 Arrêt 1.9.2015 [Section II] article 4 du Protocole n° 4 Interdiction des expulsions collectives d'étrangers Expulsion collective de migrants vers la Tunisie   : violation Article

5 §   2 et 5 §   4   ; à la violation et à la non-violation de l’article   3, respectivement, quant à leurs conditions de détention au centre d’accueil puis sur les deux navires, et

Articles 2, 3 et 13 combiné avec les articles   2 et   3   : Les allégations factuelles de la requérante concernant la violation des articles   2 et   3 de la Convention lors du

  STRASBOURG 7 janvier 2025 DÉFINITIF   30/06/2025   Cet arrêt est devenu définitif en vertu de l’article 44 § 2 de la Convention. Il peut subir des retouches de forme.

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

    Les requérants allèguent que leur rétention dans un centre d’accueil pour migrants en situation irrégulière a été opérée en violation des articles 3 et 5 de la Convention.

Consequently, there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 2 OF THE CONVENTION 47.

5 §§ 1, 2 et 4 de la Convention et à la non-violation de l’article 3 de la Convention quant aux conditions d’accueil des requérants à bord des navires Vincent et Audace .