The Court reiterates its conclusion in its decision in the case of Sokolov and Others v. Serbia ((dec), nos.

font-weight:bold } .s8DB21C27 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 69168/17 Vladimir Viktorovich SOKOLOV

had been liquidated through insolvency proceedings and could thus no longer be held responsible for the non-enforcement of final judgments given in the applicants’ favour (see, amongst many others, Sokolov

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both }   Communicated on 8 March 2016   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 11642/11 Aleksander SOKOLOW

Russia 23/04/2019 Nikolay Semenovich KHAZAKH 1950 Kramatorsk Ukrainian   14/10/2022 (by eComms — downloaded on 14/10/2022) 13/02/2024 (by eComms — downloaded on 13/02/2024) 20. 25457/19 Sokolova v

Russia 2. 68027/10 SOKOLOV v. Russia 3. 50587/11 GRIGORYEV v. Russia 4. 50796/12 GALSTYAN v. Russia 5. 20028/13 ANOSHIN v. Russia 6. 45508/13 YUDIN v. Russia 7. 57843/13 MARKOV v.

In the case of Sobolev v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Boštjan M.

.s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 }       FIFTH SECTION             CASE OF SOZONOV

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       THIRD SECTION             CASE OF SOBOLEV

Russia   05/03/2020 1988, Aleppo Syrian Irina Yevgenyevna SOKOLOVA Expulsion proceedings 18 February 2020 - administrative removal ordered by the Frunzenskiy District Court of Ivanovo 26 February

} .sE6F1442 { width:204.43pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }       THIRD SECTION               CASE OF SOKOLOV

COMMERCE DE LORIENT JUGEMENT DU 10/04/2026 Numéro d'inscription au répertoire général : 2026F222 Demandeur (s) : Représentant (s) : Défendeur (s) : [V] SARL [Adresse 1] Représentant (s) : Monsieur Sokol

Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon l'arrêt déféré (Metz, 13 décembre 2005), qu'après la mise en liquidation judiciaire de la société Sobolor, par un jugement de la chambre commerciale du tribunal de

1997, correspondant aux chaussures Zapper's dénommées Soliste et Soprano, avait été directement vendu par la société Arton à la société Master Mac, sous ces deux dénominations et encore sous oelle de Sokoto

page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s90284376 { width:202.97pt; display:inline-block } .sDEA786DA { width:210.67pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 30278/02 by Sergey SOLODOV

Lawfulness - cassation complaint rejected on 17/10/2008     2397/11 21/12/2010 Aleksandr Vanovich BALYAN 25/12/1969 Novosibirsk   Sergey Anatolyevich SOKOLOV 07/10/1969 Moscow   Ruslan

Serbia , no. 41703/06, §§ 17‑21, 2 October 2012; and Sokolov and Others v. Serbia (dec.), nos. 30859/10, § 20, 14 January 2014. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 13.

#xa0; Without invoking any particular provision of the Convention, the applicants complained of the non-enforcement of the final judgment adopted in their favour against the Republika Srpska by the Sokolac

174.97pt; display:inline-block } .sF2E32F9B { width:36.61pt; display:inline-block } .s5F32E900 { width:208.31pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION         CASE OF SOKOREV