CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.5M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

331 résultats pour « Mathilde HAAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0915DEC002345094

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 1997

15 septembre 1997

However, they complain that they had already resided in Trentino-Alto Adige for more than two years when the elections were announced, and that they had no interest in taking part in local elections for

Page 7 sur 17

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-870184-892957

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2003

6 novembre 2003

  She has on several occasions unsuccessfully applied to the German courts for an injunction preventing any further publication of a series of photographs that had appeared in the 1990s in the German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC003307110

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

been published in the Federal Law Gazette and had entered into force on 3   December 2011. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0930JUD002079906

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2010

30 septembre 2010

However, the Court has established that it guarantees individual rights, including the right to vote and to stand for election (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD000698406

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

However, the Court has established that it guarantees individual rights, including the right to vote and to stand for election (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC003396915

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2016

13 septembre 2016

    He further argued that the electoral fraud had not been corrected by the Constitutional Court because the latter had adopted a restrictive interpretation of the term “elections” in Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415JUD002888107

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

candidate, had had no such advantage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-76212

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2006

21 juin 2006

Rules of the Court (old Rule 44, paragraph 2) provides that the striking-out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1022JUD002127902

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2007

22 octobre 2007

Mathieu Lindon indeed stated at the hearing that he had made much use of information in the news and, as a result, the reader may not be able to distinguish clearly between fact and fiction, so clear was

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 5 - Chambre 1

61624d6aed30a8f5617382ea

Appel

27 novembre 2013

27 novembre 2013

assisté de Me Christian HOLLIER-LAROUSSE, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : P0362 (HOLLIER-LAROUSSE & Associés) Monsieur [Q] [E] [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] Représenté et assisté de Me Gérard HAAS

Source officielle
CE

1ère et 4ème chambres réunies

ECLI:FR:CECHR:2023:453389.20230330

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2023

30 mars 2023

Mathieu Le Coq, rapporteur public ; La parole ayant été donnée, après les conclusions, à la SCP Foussard, Froger, avocat de M.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2156558-2291089

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2007

22 octobre 2007

Overall the Court considered that the Court of Appeal had adopted a measured approach and that it had made a reasonable assessment of the facts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624DEC000469209

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2014

24 juin 2014

that it had the authority to examine whether certain legislation had been passed with the purpose of serving the public interest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705DEC002881112

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2016

5 juillet 2016

    In Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0925DEC003432096

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2001

25 septembre 2001

Further, it was stated that Mr Rauter had given a press conference and had successfully defended his integrity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002483994

Admin. suprême

19 février 1998

19 février 1998

    Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0615DEC005249299

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2000

15 juin 2000

It has no independent existence, since it has effect solely in relation to the "rights and freedoms" safeguarded by those provisions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0215JUD002608117

Admin. suprême

15 février 2022

15 février 2022

    The Court has established that Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 guarantees individual rights, including the right to vote and to stand for election (see, inter alia , Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD004360910

Admin. suprême

27 février 2018

27 février 2018

They explained that the January 2010 by-elections had been exceptional because a parliamentary seat had fallen vacant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1024JUD006895817

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2023

24 octobre 2023

In the Government’s submission, the applicants had had several remedies at their disposal in respect of their complaints.

Source officielle