courts (see Garcia Ruiz v.

par Me Crécent et Me Vieira, demandent au juge des référés, saisi sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d'ordonner la suspension de l'exécution de l'arrêté inter-préfectoral

1944 and lives in Białystok, Poland.

siège social est situé [Adresse 1] à [Localité 1], prise en la personne de son gérant en exercice demeurant en cette qualité audit siège social Représentée par Me Pierre FONROUGE de la SELARL KPDB INTER-BARREAUX

1949 and lives in Adana.

In 2003, the Ministry of Finance carried out an investigation in the Gaziantep Provincial Treasury Department.

valoir quant à lui, l'existence de charges convergentes à l'encontre du demandeur tenant selon lui aux conditions de révélation des faits, à l'appétence établie de Jean-Charles X... pour les jeunes garçons

Gersing (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 4) (art. 43). Mr. E. García de Enterría, substitute judge, subsequently replaced Mr.

1969 and lives in Gevgelija.

    Finding a violation of the right of access to a court, the Constitutional Court stated, inter alia , that the Supreme Court had erred in applying the 2004 Act, because in all cases which

La Cour admet qu'une motivation plus étayée des raisons de l'infirmation de la solution retenue par la cour d'appel eût été souhaitable pour le requérant ( García Ruiz c.

In the case of Lantos v.

Rule 49 of the Rules of Court;       Having deliberated;     Decides as follows:   THE FACTS   The applicant is a Finnish citizen, born in 1973 and resident in Helsinki

In general this includes, inter alia , not only the right to be present, but also to hear and follow the proceedings.

In the case of Sprūds and Others v.

In the case of Alkes v.

    In June 2006 the trial of Mr Pereversin, Mr Malakhovskiy and Mr   Valdes-Garcia started at the Basmanniy District Court of Moscow. That trial was held in camera.

He gave further details on those issues when questioned in Berlin in late March.

Where an infringement has taken place, the person affected may, inter alia, request that the wrongdoer make a relevant statement in an appropriate form, or demand satisfaction from him or her.