The court referred the matter to the supervisory authorities, who found the child and S.C. in December 2001. The family affairs court entrusted the child to his mother.

The applicant’s child was admitted to the child-minding centre located in the same village. 14.     On 1 December 2011 the applicant found the child at the Bezdryk child-minding centre.

him access to the child and was manipulating the child into rejecting him, under threat of punishment.

of the child and both parents) that all established that the child had developed the closest relationships with the mother, that being with the mother caused positive emotions in the child, whereas being

She explained that the applicant could keep contact with the child through webcam, that she kept him updated with the developments of the child and that he did not support the child financially.

Sur 22 suffrages exprimés, la liste " Avec vous, changeons Saint-Chély " en a obtenu 16 et la liste " Ensemble pour Saint-Chély " en a recueilli 6.

she be awarded child support and child support debt from the applicant.

development of the child.

possibility for the child to live and develop in a stable environment.

Conclusion : – violation in respect of the child (unanimously).

return of the child.

In 2005 his former wife remarried and lives with her new husband and the child, as well as a further child the new couple had together. The applicant’s last contact with his child was in 2004.

by any means with any child-care facility, pre-school or school attended by the child or with a parent of any other child attending the same institution.

départementale des valeurs locatives de l’Essonne, publiée le 18 décembre 2025, en tant qu’elle a assigné un coefficient de localisation de 1,3 à la parcelle cadastrée AB n° 558 située sur la commune de Chilly-Mazarin

In 2004 the applicant, a German national, married A.S., a Polish national with whom he had a child, born in 2005. In 2011 A.S. and the child went to live in Poland.

child in 2002, the applicant, a single woman aged 47, sought authorisation to receive a second child with a view to adoption.

father had no right of access to an illegitimate child, but that he could adopt the child if he obtained the consent of its mother.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que Mme X... a été engagée le 2 mai 1968 par l'ambassade de l'Etat du Chili à Paris en qualité de

In April 2003 the Swiss Federal Court, ruling at last instance, dismissed an appeal by the mother and ordered the return of the child to Italy. The child and his mother returned.