The Prime Minister did not pursue any charges or compensation claims against the applicant.

The applicant company is based in Helsinki.

de données 3613 Intracom font apparaître que le numéro d'assujetti intracommunautaire BE 429177587 correspond à la société Belge BVBA TEFRON FOTO siseBelgielei 52018 Antwerpen.CF Pièce8 ; que la rue Barthet

    Complaints declared admissible   48.

    COMPLAINTS   1.    The applicant complains about the decisions changing his daughter's surname.

, laquelle a son siège social à Lorient - 97133 Saint-Barthélémy (pièce n° 7) et qu'il a déposé le 12 janvier 2000 une déclaration de modification mentionnant que la gérance était assumée, à compter du

In August 1995 he set up a company which prepared medical reports at his clients’ request. 7.

, laquelle a son siège social à Lorient - 97133 Saint-Barthélémy (pièce n° 7) et qu'il a déposé le 12 janvier 2000 une déclaration de modification mentionnant que la gérance était assumée, à compter du

    A declaration in support of the charges shall not replace the criminal complaint in cases where [the criminal complaint] is necessary for the prosecution ... nor shall the criminal complaint

The Government accept that a complete ban on the programme proposed by Channel Four would not have been proportionate to the need to protect the trial.

of the date on which the former decision awarding compensation became final.”

These, however, were accusations which the complainant had contested in his complaint alleging defamation.

       At the hearing of 8 November 1993, the 19b Auxiliary Criminal Chamber dismissed the applicant's complaints.

from its jurisdiction; as a result, such a complaint cannot be deemed an effective remedy within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention.

  Reference was made to the Competition Ombudsman’s finding. 22.

Moreover, she was ordered to pay 5,000 euros to tax inspector A. in compensation.

It further ordered that the applicant pay compensation to Mr V. and his daughter-in-law in the amount of RUB 2,000 (approximately EUR 55). 20.

It argued that the applicants had failed sufficiently to substantiate this complaint.

She pursued a compensation claim jointly and severally against the applicant, the editor-in-chief and the publishing company, which was joined to the criminal charges.