Nor can Article 35 § 1 be interpreted in a manner which would require an applicant to seize the Court of his complaint before his position in connection with the matter has been finally settled at the

His raising this matter before the trial court had been irrelevant since he had only sought the exclusion of his confession statement. 2.     The applicant 41.

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

    On 6 December 2004 the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnodar quashed the decision of 7 May 2004 and remitted the matter for further investigation.

Thus, it considers that this matter falls to be examined below under the substantive provisions of the Convention (see paragraphs 39-46 below). II.

Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   4.

    On 31 March 2008 the prosecutor’s office decided not to prosecute, on the ground that the matters alleged did not constitute criminal offences. 18 .

He further challenged the findings of the trial court as to the circumstances of the matter.

The Jurisdictional Relations in Criminal Matters Act) 23 .

Following the supervisory review of the appeal judgment, on 27   March 2006 the appeal court quashed the verdict and remitted the matter for a new trial (see paragraphs 23-29 above).

In this connection the Court reiterates that the authorities must act of their own motion once the matter has come to their attention.

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

remedy ineffective; in such a case it is appropriate to take as the start of the six-month period the date when he first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Paul and Audrey

While expressing dissatisfaction with the investigation, the applicant did not indicate what other measures the authorities could have taken to investigate the matter.

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

Because of these shortcomings, the actual circumstances in which the applicants’ relative, Ş.C., died remain a matter of speculation and assumption, and there is insufficient evidence on which to conclude

However, it noted that the proper way to deal with such matters was not to seek transfer to another hospital but to inform the nursing staff and ask them to take steps to avert future incidents, which

It will therefore examine this matter in respect of each application below. (a)    General principles 27.