CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

27 275 résultats pour « Wayl »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115037

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2012

7 novembre 2012

They requested that the local land development plan be amended in such a way as to have these roads reclassified as municipal roads owned by the municipality.

Source officielle

Page 69 sur 1364

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150343

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2014

17 décembre 2014

On 4 April 2011 the Slavutych Court, having considered the applicant’s claim by way of abridged administrative procedure, allowed the applicant’s claim for pension recalculation.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

Novembre 2001, sur les dispositions pénales et civilesc/Monsieur IFERGANE X

6253c8c4bd3db21cbdd8637e

Appel

1 juillet 2002

1 juillet 2002

, Représentée par Maître RONDIN Sandrine, avocat au barreau de PARIS LE MINISTÈRE PUBLIC : appelant, VILLE DE PARIS, Hotel de Ville - 75004 PARIS 04 Partie civile, appelante, Représentée par Maître WALLER

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606JUD001403109

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2019

6 juin 2019

The report suggested that the building was in poor technical condition with its carrying walls unsafe.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD003076006

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2016

23 juin 2016

All of the above persons had approached the building and had seen footprints in the snow leading to a conveyor belt opening in the wall.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0327JUD000872105

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2007

27 mars 2007

He was handcuffed to a wall heater until his surgery on 19 November 2004 and was guarded at all times by two CFECC officers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0119JUD003224519

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2023

19 janvier 2023

Metal fragments were extracted from the hole in the wall, which measured some 3   cm.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55783

Admin. suprême

11 juin 1998

11 juin 1998

held that the respondent State was to pay to the applicant, within three months, in respect of legal costs and expenses, 13 000 pounds sterling, less 15   421   French francs already paid by way

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55776

Admin. suprême

11 juin 1998

11 juin 1998

    _ held that the respondent State was to pay the applicant, within three months, in respect of legal costs and expenses, 19 000 pounds sterling, less 14 475 French francs already paid by way

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC001401102

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

.; -... to provide Ms Keil (Gazayeva), in compensation for three houses and a jewellery shop confiscated by way of repression, with three land plots within the Nalchik territory for construction of houses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905DEC000772106

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2017

5 septembre 2017

  1 to the Convention about the quashing by way of supervisory review of the judgment in his favour. He further complained under Article 6 § 1 about the excessive length of the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1103DEC003154809

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2016

3 novembre 2016

    The applicant is understood to complain under Article 6 of the Convention and Article   1 of the Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the quashing by way of supervisory review of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13680

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2022

9 juin 2022

The fact that this was the first time it had applied those instruments in combination did not mean that the restriction at issue had been in any way unforeseeable or arbitrary vis-à-vis the applicant,

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2805242-3077303

Admin. suprême

23 juillet 2009

23 juillet 2009

Relying on Article 6 (right to a fair trial), the applicant association complained of having been deprived of access to a court as a result of quashing, by way of supervisory review, of the earlier  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:1219DEC000493371

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 1972

19 décembre 1972

  It is not clear from the way in which the applicant has presented the facts of his case to the Commission how he considers that they constitute a violation of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1007DEC006302100

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2004

7 octobre 2004

The applicant's subsequent requests to the Supreme Court of Russia pursuing the reopening of the case concerning non-pecuniary damages by way of supervisory review proceedings were unsuccessful, of which

Source officielle
TJ

Référés

68e7a525033cf481c39a4158

T. Judiciaire

8 octobre 2025

8 octobre 2025

désenfumages, à l’entretien des blocs de secours et de la VMC, ° les courriers de résiliation adressés aux sociétés SAGEX et GARANKA, et les accusés de réception, ° les contrats conclus avec la société TECH-WAY

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114369

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2012

8 octobre 2012

On his way back from the shop the applicant noticed the same police officers together with two young men. When he walked further along the street, the two men approached him and started to beat him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12177

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2018

6 novembre 2018

of the rights and freedoms of others”, particularly those of the applicant’s colleague – as an alleged victim of harassment in the workplace – by acknowledging and publicly disclosing the facts as a way

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0308DEC002873003

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2007

8 mars 2007

On 11 December 2002 the Presidium of the Tomsk Regional Court, by way of supervisory-review proceedings, quashed the judgments of 15   July and 12 September 2002 and acquitted the former husband.

Source officielle