The applicant was interviewed again with his solicitor present on 29 June and 26 July 1995 and remained silent to the allegations.

The applicant chose to remain silent and refused to make a statement.

Society should not remain silent.” 14.

The report in question stated that the applicant had been informed of his rights as a suspect, including the right to have access to a lawyer, as well as his right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination

SAINT-NAZAIRE Société OXXOM AYANT POUR ANCIENNE DÉNOMINATION GUERIN PEIN TURE ATLANTIQUE - RCS [Localité 30] 751 336 371 dont le siège social est situé [Adresse 2] Rep/assistant : Maître Jean-christophe SIEBERT

LE PARC DE LA COLETRIE Pris en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 5] [Localité 12] Représentée par Me Jean-Christophe SIEBERT de la SELARL TORRENS

Par deux mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 24 décembre 2021 et 22 février 2022, la société DLE Ouest, représentée par Me Siebert, demande au juge des référés : 1°) à titre principal, de constater

n'étant pas communiqués), la société Le Bâtiment Guérandais, la société Lang construction et la SCP Philippe Delaere, en qualité de liquidateur de la société Lang construction, représentées par Me Siebert

    It is necessary for the judge to make clear to the jury that the defendant is entitled to remain silent. That is his right and his choice. 3.

The applicant remained silent.        The applicant saw his solicitor on 15 March 1989 at 11.26 hours. He was advised to remain silent.

  However, the trial judge drew very strong inferences, under Articles 4 and 6 of the Order, from his decision to remain silent under police questioning and during the trial.

PAR CES MOTIFS, la Cour : REJETTE le pourvoi ; Condamne la société Silbeco France aux dépens ; En application de l'article 700 du code de procédure civile, rejette la demande formée par la société

  A silent mutual understanding between the offenders at the moment of the crime could be sufficient.

He was questioned in accordance with the procedure provided for in Articles 64 and 65 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but declared he intended to avail himself of the right to remain silent.

The decision of the Court of Appeal was silent as to the alleged contradiction between the oral and written versions of the first-instance court’s judgment.

particular of his right to allege a personal bias of the chamber’s members, to express his opinion on the charges and evidence, to submit facts and evidence in his defence, and of his right to remain silent

When the applicant remained silent, another prison officer, O.P., who was also present in the cell, asked him whether he wanted to become a so-called “thief in law” (see in this connection Ashlarba v.

The applicant remained silent at first but soon afterwards confided in her friend that a man had had sexual intercourse with her against her will. The friend advised the applicant to report it.

According to a form explaining arrested persons’ rights which the applicant signed, he was informed of the charges against him and of his right to remain silent.