CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

3 442 résultats pour « Putignier »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD000892105

Admin. suprême

3 février 2011

3 février 2011

He further referred to “Putin's KGB regime” and “the Kremlin thieves”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1001DEC000175207

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2009

1 octobre 2009

The court considers that if released the applicant may abscond, interfere with establishment of the truth by putting pressure on witnesses, or commit new crimes.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0111DEC002261493

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 1995

11 janvier 1995

  I hope that is not a      disrespectful way of putting it, your Honour's discretion on the      point is clear.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD001489804

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2006

7 décembre 2006

The purpose of the exhaustion rule is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to it (see

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-938509-966653

Admin. suprême

26 février 2004

26 février 2004

The Court considered that the legitimate aim of effecting a lawful arrest could not justify putting human life at risk where the fugitive had committed a non-violent offence and did not pose a threat to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125DEC004223702

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2007

25 janvier 2007

The Court reiterates that the rule on non-exhaustion contained in Article   35 § 1 of the Convention affords the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0612DEC002990603

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2007

12 juin 2007

On 8 May 2001 the applicant was arrested in İzmir by gendarmerie officers on suspicion of having committed the offence of “putting fake foreign money in circulation” (piyasaya sahte yabanci para sürmek

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1122DEC004197898

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2001

22 novembre 2001

In order to answer this question, the scope of the measure must be determined by putting it in the context of the facts of the case and of the relevant legislation (see the Glasenapp v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923DEC006390500

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2003

23 septembre 2003

These proceedings remain pending before domestic courts, before which the applicant can raise, at least in substance, the complaints which is now putting before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD007766001

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2011

20 janvier 2011

    The Court considers that in the circumstances of the present case the reparation should aim at putting the applicant company in the position in which it would have been had the violation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002701495

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 1997

2 juillet 1997

Therefore, the applicant was responsible for the contents of the tip (and could be required to remove it) even if he had not been responsible for putting it there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0504DEC001692603

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2006

4 mai 2006

The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-106915

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2011

14 septembre 2011

  In March 1993, the Committee of Ministers adopted Resolution DH(93)6, putting an end to the examination of the case on the basis of information provided concerning the general measures taken to

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2988314-3299337

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2010

15 janvier 2010

Their son and brother Faruk Tuna died in 1980 when he was a student from injuries sustained while he was being held in police custody for putting a poster on display.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC001243708

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2012

16 octobre 2012

    Relying on Article 18 the applicant also complained that he had been arrested with the real aim of putting pressure on his family so as to transfer ownership of their company to the head

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171432

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2017

23 janvier 2017

Its aim should relate to freely expressing one’s opinions and putting forward claims about various political, economic, social or cultural issues arising in the country or in relation to its foreign policy

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516JUD002391515

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2017

16 mai 2017

    The Court reiterates that the purpose of Article 35 § 1 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112DEC005323511

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2013

12 novembre 2013

    In this connection, the purpose of Article 35 § 1 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312DEC005253809

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2019

12 mars 2019

In a similar vein, putting the same defendant on trial for an offence for which he or she has already been finally acquitted or convicted may raise issues concerning that defendant’s right not to be tried

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC005913316

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2019

25 juin 2019

court may – ex officio , or on the application of the public prosecution service or at the request of the suspect – order that the detention on remand shall be suspended as soon as the suspect, after putting

Source officielle

Page 69 sur 173

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC7 résultats

Journal officiel
Modifications diverses

PUTIGNIER, Mireille, MARFAING

SIREN 343776811Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Draguignan

16/06/2024

Voir →

Créations

AGENCE IMMO.CAMPS, PUTIGNIER, Mireille, MARFAING

SIREN 343776811Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Draguignan

14/05/2023

Voir →

Modifications diverses

SCP PUTIGNIER MARFAING

SIREN 400466009Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de St-Etienne

16/04/2023

Voir →

Créations

JUST ZACK, PUTIGNIER, Zackary, Matisse, PUTIGNIER-GELLING

SIREN 921353272Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Caen

18/11/2022

Voir →

Radiations

RAVE FOREST SHOP, PUTIGNIER, Matthieu Benoît

SIREN 817522972GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE ST-ETIENNE

17/02/2017

Voir →