Has the applicant’s right of access to a court provided for in Article   6 §   1 of the Convention been disproportionately restricted by the Bucharest County Court’s decision of

    It appears that the applicant, subsequent to the High Court's decision of 24 October 1994, requested the Bailiff's Court to arrange for a hearing of the psychologist.

In pursuit of the complaint, on 31 March 2010 the Vas Department Chief Prosecutor’s Office filed a motion with the Vas County Regional Court, endorsing the applicant’s complaint.

Following this, it forwarded the appeals to the County Administrative Court. 15.

A copy of the complaint submitted to the Court by the Government bears a handwritten note “Complaint received. Tartu County Court. 10.10.02” and a seal and signature of a judge of the County Court.

The Supreme Administrative Court refused the applicant father’s request for an oral hearing and upheld the County Administrative Court’s decision.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par M.

Réponse de la Cour Vu l'article L. 8221-6 II du code du travail : 5.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : I - Sur le pourvoi n° X 97-18.716 formé par la Banque Courtois, dont le siège

During the proceedings she unsuccessfully challenged the judge and the court, claiming that they lacked impartiality as the defendant company had carried out work in the court's new building free of charge

  ARTICLE 2 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 Complaint not pursued before the Court. Conclusion : no need to examine it of the Court's own motion (unanimously). IV.

La SCI Cortis ne formule aucune observation sur ce point.

Following this, it forwarded the appeal to the County Administrative Court ( länsrätten ) of the County of Stockholm.

    Did the Zagreb County Court in its judgment of 28 April 2015 address the applicant’s argument that the appeal was inadmissible for being lodged out of time?   2.

  Period to be taken into consideration Starting-point (in each case): institution of proceedings in the magistrate's court.

  Period to be taken into consideration Starting-point (in each case): institution of proceedings in the magistrate's court.

  Period to be taken into consideration Starting-point (in each case): institution of proceedings in the magistrate's court.

  Period to be taken into consideration Starting-point (in each case): institution of proceedings in the magistrate's court.