CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 619 résultats pour « Arena »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56286

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2003

20 octobre 2003

In this judgment, the Supreme Court notably assessed the balance of public and private interests in the light of the notion of “permissible criticism” of individuals and associations that enter the arena

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0407DEC002804902

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2009

7 avril 2009

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0525DEC004348898

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2000

25 mai 2000

s79770FBD { width:10.69pt; display:inline-block } .s929BA24B { width:192.48pt; display:inline-block } DEUXIÈME SECTION   DÉCISION FINALE   Requête n° 43488/98 présentée par Fortunato et Domenico ARENA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1123DEC005165899

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 1999

23 novembre 1999

D.H., arrêts Arena, Andreucci et Cormio c. Italie du 27 février 1992, série A n° 228-G, p. 76, § 17, série A n° 228-H, p. 85, § 17 et série   A n° 228-I, p. 94, § 17).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002726595

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 1997

2 juillet 1997

décision du 18 décembre 1962, la municipalité de Rome adopta un plan d'urbanisme ("piano regolatore generale") qui prévoyait notamment la destination du terrain de la requérante à espace verte public ("area

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503DEC006777701

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318DEC006650601

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2008

18 mars 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC002800802

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401JUD001282802

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2008

1 avril 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC002800702

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC002795602

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0902DEC005505000

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2008

2 septembre 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC006547701

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC007694401

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC002797802

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC002806902

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC004271202

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC004269302

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC002806502

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC002795302

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

It noted that, in view of this, the multitude of cases before the Court and the fact that the HRA defence was only applicable in the domestic arena, the Government were prepared, in principle, to settle

Source officielle

Page 69 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →