CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

4 744 résultats pour « Sher MESSINGER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1517804-1597386

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2005

1 décembre 2005

The Court accepted the fact that she had delayed making an application for family reunion in the Netherlands as she believed, and was advised by her legal representative, that she first had to obtain a

Page 68 sur 238

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0216JUD004376807

Admin. suprême

16 février 2017

16 février 2017

    The Court next notes that the applicant’s complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35   §   3   (a) of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1022DEC003509597

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1998

22 octobre 1998

The manner in which the behaviour is improper is apparent from the particulars of the charge sheet.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624DEC007757511

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2014

24 juin 2014

The Court shares this view.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219DEC004039712

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

In reaching this conclusion the court considered, inter alia , that TPB had provided the opportunity for others to share copyright-protected material.

Source officielle
CC

comm

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:CO00314

Cassation

18 mai 2022

18 mai 2022

Selon le commandant [L], (pièce 26 des intimées) "dans l'industrie pétrolière et plus précisément encore dans celle de l'extraction du pétrole off shore, le mot espagnol "aceite" est équivalent au mot

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430DEC003726510

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2013

30 avril 2013

    The applicant Van Gerwe farmed at two locations, on one of which he was building a new pig shed in 1995; farming began there in 1996.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612DEC004171005

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2018

12 juin 2018

The remaining 10% of the shares were owned by Mr A.Ts. (“the minority shareholder”). 5 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD003096517

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2022

15 mars 2022

The documents submitted indicate that their real value was approximately EUR 140 at the time (thirty-six shares with a closing price of ISK 654 per share on 3 October 2008, amounting to a total value of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0714DEC001276387

Admin. suprême

14 juillet 1988

14 juillet 1988

          On 20 February 1986, A attended a meeting with the local authority and agreed that adoption was in the best interests of the child and that she wished

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0110JUD004814099

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2006

10 janvier 2006

The court gave the following reasons for its decision: “At the request of the court, the plaintiff has submitted its balance sheets as of 30   November 1997 and of 30 March 1998, as well as a bank

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0930DEC004741199

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2003

30 septembre 2003

After giving birth, she lived in a special home and when she later got her own home she received support in the form of contact with social welfare officers, childcare personnel, home assistance and a

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324JUD002786603

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2009

24 mars 2009

    The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520JUD003523211

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2014

20 mai 2014

It found that in reality the company was owned by four Finnish persons with equal shares and therefore the taxation decisions were not incorrect. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315JUD005312008

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2016

15 mars 2016

    The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0516DEC003195602

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2006

16 mai 2006

She claimed that she had suffered unjustified discrimination on the ground of her religion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-148363

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2014

4 novembre 2014

    Did the applicant have a fair hearing within the meaning of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617DEC007173101

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2003

17 juin 2003

The applicant argued that she was not employed and that her only means were payments for her share in marital property received from her husband.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161282

Admin. suprême

11 février 2016

11 février 2016

    Did the applicant have a fair hearing within the meaning of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68251-68719

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2000

19 septembre 2000

and Industry appointed inspectors to investigate the acquisition of the Distillers company by Guinness following allegations and rumours to the effect that certain persons had engaged in an unlawful share

Source officielle