CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 466 résultats pour « Querry »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1222JUD004006398

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2004

22 décembre 2004

    In July 2004, in reply to a query by the Court’s registry, the applicant informed the Court about the Sofia Appellate Court’s judgment of 24 March 2004 which awarded him compensation for

Page 68 sur 74

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD002402907

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

    On 6 March 2003, in reply to a query from the applicant, the police advised her that her caution would remain on record for five years, and so would be held on record until 17 November 2005

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD001737302

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2007

17 juillet 2007

    In a letter of 4 April 2000 the Municipal Office, in reply to a query submitted by the applicant and other persons, stated that the municipal authorities were under no obligation to provide

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016JUD004502607

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2012

16 octobre 2012

    On 1   March 2007 the president of the Przemysl Regional Court explained to the applicant, in a letter of response to the applicant’s query, that only his legal guardian could institute

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527JUD001876805

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2010

27 mai 2010

    In a letter dated 28 January 2005 the Ministry of the Interior, in reply to a query from the Public Defender's Office, provided its version of the incident of 1 November 2004.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD002301604

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2012

31 juillet 2012

    In response to an apparent query from the Çukurca gendarmerie, the Van public prosecutor noted in a letter of 29 March 2006 that the fact that Ahmet   Er’s family had obtained a decree

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0627JUD001156205

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2006

27 juin 2006

    By a letter of 23 November 2004, in reply to a query submitted by the civil court on 8 November 2004, the Regional Agent for Disciplinary Matters of the local Chamber of Physicians reiterated

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0514JUD002181003

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2009

14 mai 2009

    By letter of 13 March 2003 the prosecutor’s office of the Chechen Republic forwarded the first applicant’s query, described as “erroneously transmitted to them”, to the unit prosecutor’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0312JUD001535103

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2013

12 mars 2013

    On 17 January 2005 the Szczytno Remand Centre governor informed the applicant, in reply to the latter’s query, that during his detention “adequate help was secured [to him] by the remand

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD002308707

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2011

19 avril 2011

Following her query about the possible presence of social workers during those meetings, she was informed that this was not the usual practice. 51.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020JUD002025620

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2022

20 octobre 2022

On 12 July 2004 the latter replied that no answer had been received to its query of 10 February 2004.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0107JUD002596504

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2010

7 janvier 2010

xa0;   On 11 April 2006 the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation wrote to the Cypriot Ministry of Justice requesting an update on the suspended hearing and reiterating its query

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1007JUD002849002

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2014

7 octobre 2014

In reply to their query of 19   August 2002, the responsible investigator informed the applicants that on 28   May 2002 a decision had been taken to close the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-176040

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2017

11 juillet 2017

He has not received any response to his query.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD001864010

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

    The press release issued in response [to the CONSOB’s query], approved by Mr   Grande Stevens, merely indicated that Exor had “neither instituted nor examined initiatives with regard

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD003871816

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2021

25 mars 2021

A query had therefore been sent to the SIZO about the possibility of arranging such visits.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110JUD004032498

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2005

10 novembre 2005

Subsequently, upon query, the applicant filed a further document. On 11   May 1997 the applicant filed further submissions in support of his lawyer’s observations. 60.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0917REP002511694

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 1998

17 septembre 1998

  According to a handwritten file note drafted by the Court of Appeal Rapporteur, the applicant's counsel, upon a telephone query, agreed to a decision on the question of the applicant's continued

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0603JUD002064120

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2025

3 juin 2025

    On 18 June 2004 the Serbian Ministry for Work, Employment and Social Policy responded to a query by informing Kosovo’s Ombudsman that the pension system in Serbia was based on the concept

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD003279407

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2015

15 décembre 2015

    Additionally, on 25 October 2006 the Environment Minister replied to the parliamentary query (interpelacja poselska) made on behalf of the applicant by J.Z., a member of the Polish Parliament

Source officielle