CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 489 résultats pour « Feng »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-247610

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2025

20 novembre 2025

of severely damaged property (damaged external facade, debris in the yard, damaged ceiling and floor, damaged furniture, belongings turned upside down, cracked walls, severely damaged roof, damaged fence

Page 68 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503JUD004100904

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2011

3 mai 2011

The applicant had seen through a crack in the fence that her husband Visita and his brother Visadi had been put by police officers into a UAZ car and after that the car had driven away.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0129JUD001571113

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2015

29 janvier 2015

  18156/05, § 69, 27 May 2010; Fener Rum Patrikliği (Ecumenical Patriarchy) v. Turkey (just satisfaction), no.   14340/05, §   35, 15   June 2010, §   198; and Stoycheva v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1006JUD005246415

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2020

6 octobre 2020

  18156/05, § 69, 27   May 2010; Fener Rum Patrikliği (Ecumenical Patriarchy) v. Turkey (just satisfaction), no.   14340/05, § 35, 15 June 2010; and Stoycheva v. Bulgaria , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD001367003

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

The seventh applicant’s wife managed to see through the fence that the servicemen then visited three neighbouring houses and took her son to the courtyard of each of those houses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0529JUD003731503

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2008

29 mai 2008

She also discovered that her fence had been broken through on that same night, so as to allow access into the courtyard of the Betayevs’ house. 2. The Government’s account 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1001JUD002700106

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2009

1 octobre 2009

The property was surrounded by a fence and had a common entrance gate. The first and second applicants occupied one house, which had a grocery store attached to it belonging to the family.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0702JUD001544005

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2009

2 juillet 2009

Ms N. had stepped outside her house and observed through a hole in the fence a group of servicemen forcing Salman Abdulazizov into a Ural vehicle.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917JUD001556906

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2009

17 septembre 2009

The MVD grounds, including the MVD building, were surrounded by a high fence and could be entered only through a checkpoint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD000301904

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2008

12 juin 2008

About ten of the armed men climbed over the fence and entered Musa Elmurzayev's house.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1002JUD003800303

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2008

2 octobre 2008

After that they saw Ramzan Rasayev, who was ordered to lean against a fence with his hands up.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD004339398

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

In his statement, the applicant alleged that about eight to ten officers had dragged him to the metallic fence of the construction site behind the Slovenj Gradec Health Centre where they had beaten him

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011JUD003187196

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2001

11 octobre 2001

She stated that the fact that the applicant was always standing at the fence of the schoolyard disturbed her and that she did not wish to visit the applicant even if access should be ordered by the court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002515494

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2001

18 janvier 2001

This land is separated from the adjacent house by a screen fence, which continues along the rear boundary of the appeal site.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD004889899

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2003

6 mai 2003

The boy decided that when he grew up he would pass over to the other side of the fence. No longer subservient like dad, but keeping the upper hand.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0229DEC004561999

Admin. suprême

29 février 2000

29 février 2000

that very reason the applicants cannot complain of the delay in proceeding with the main action since a substantial part of that delay results from the interlocutory proceedings which were intended to fend

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1980:1106JUD000736776

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 1980

6 novembre 1980

This area was bordered by the sea, roads and a cemetery; there was no fence to mark out the perimeter. About nine-tenths of the island was occupied by a prison. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927JUD005632807

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2011

27 septembre 2011

applicant was vulnerable for any other reason; however, it was found that the applicant was not hindered in the performance of everyday tasks by any medical problems and that she was no less able to fend

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD000939005

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2011

3 novembre 2011

On the way to the car, the applicant had tried to hold on to a door frame, the rails of the staircase and a metal fence on the street, and had bent her feet so that the policemen had had to carry her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD003746105

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2010

22 avril 2010

The men unloaded a ladder and used it to climb over the fence into the applicant's yard. 9.     The men neither identified themselves nor produced any documents.

Source officielle