That decision can be challenged before the administrative courts. 33.

Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Nona Tsotsoria,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

It is a fundamental principle that no detention which is arbitrary can be compatible with Article 5 § 1 and the notion of “arbitrariness” in Article 5 § 1 extends beyond lack of conformity with national

    In the present case the Court is not persuaded that all reasonable efforts can be said to have been made to secure the attendance of the witness K.M. at the applicant’s trial.

In this regard, the question whether an applicant can claim to be a victim of the violation alleged is relevant at all stages of the proceedings under the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia , no.

This issue must be considered by the Court on its merits and cannot be discarded on account of the findings made in the context of the enforcement proceedings in the Shestakov case. 32.

against Italy, where the Court had found Article 6 applicable in its civil limb at the investigative stage of the proceedings despite the fact that, according to the domestic law, the injured person can

Kim bilir kaç bin insanın canı kurtuldu, kaç bin gencin canı kurtuldu, kaç bin ananın acısını önlediniz fena mı oldu? Önerimiz yerindeydi, doğruydu, ısrar ettik gerçekleşti.

    Since 1 November 2014 Article 17 § 2 has included non ‑ pecuniary damage in the list of the types of civil damage for which compensation can be claimed in civil proceedings.

It also embodies, more generally, the principle that only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty ( nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege ) (see Kokkinakis v.

COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL : PRESIDENT : Katia CHEDIN, vice-présidente, rédacteur ASSESSEUR : Ariane SIMON, vice-présidente, rédacteur ASSESSEUR : Patrick BURNICHON, magistrat à titre temporaire GREFFIER : Alexandra

The Court observes that these objections were identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

    The third applicant, Mr Alexandrov (application no. 9777/10) 15.

cannot be taken into account at the merits stage (see Demades v.

  After the opening speech by the Chairman of the Association and a solemn performance of the anthem of Todor Alexandrov, three young men threw smoke bombs inside the conference hall, which caused

The cumulative effect of such conditions can prove extremely detrimental to prisoners... [Prisoners unsuited for continued detention] 70.

        The applicant was subsequently transferred to the Central Police Headquarters of Athens in Alexandras avenue where he was detained until 24 August 1994.

  The State can       interfere in the management of a private business only through       these courts.