Siebert, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 3 mars 2026. La rapporteure, F. Milin-Rance Le président, B. Coudert La greffière, A.

Siebert, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 3 mars 2026. La rapporteure, F. Milin-Rance Le président, B. Coudert La greffière, A.

audit siège [Adresse 2] [Localité 2] Représentée par Me Hugo CASTRES substitué par Me DOGRU de la SELEURL HUGO CASTRES, postulant, avocat au barreau de RENNES Représentée par Me Jean-christophe SIEBERT

However, the bill’s wording is not fully explicit on this subject, and the text before us is silent as to the possible effects of earlier court decisions on the Compensation Board’s decisions, and also

    It appears that on 3 October 2002 an interview with the applicant did not take place, as the applicant chose to remain silent. 16 .

    On 10   January 2004, when questioned in the presence of lawyer B., the applicant chose to remain silent. B.     Trial and appeal proceedings 20.

During questioning, the applicant refused to answer any questions, referring to his constitutional right to remain silent.

The Court of Appeal was silent as to the applicant’s specific complaints concerning the narcotic substances being planted on him by the police, the conditions in which the search had been carried out,

According to the Government, the record contained a note to the effect that the applicant had been notified of his procedural rights, including the right to remain silent and to have legal representation

The court’s decision was silent as to the applicant’s particular complaints. The relevant part of the decision reads: “...

the right to legal assistance and to have the defence lawyer present during the implementation of all investigative measures; the right to make statements on the charges ( обяснения ) or to remain silent

He confirmed on a pre-printed form that he had received that information, that he did not want to avail himself of his right to remain silent and that he was willing to give evidence.

Today I would like to speak about a topic on which the so-called official media keep silent, and on which politicians keep silent too.

    In [ Saunders , cited above] the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) held that the prohibition of forced self-incrimination is connected with the right to remain silent, which means that

The applicant denied the charge of illegal restraint and, in consultation with his lawyer, invoked his right to remain silent. 7 .

Convention, the applicant alleged, first, that he had been deprived of his right of access to a lawyer while in police custody, without being given sufficient information about his right to remain silent

   Alleged violation of the Convention by the denial of the right       to keep silent   41.

    The Court of Appeal was silent as to the applicant’s particular complaints concerning the drugs being planted on him by the police, the conditions in which the search had been carried out

Unlike the position in criminal proceedings, persons heard by a parliamentary commission of inquiry do not have the right to remain silent.