Ms D., the victim, stated that she feared that if released the applicant may hurt her. She had learned that the applicant's parents had been asking others about her new address.

2   pounds sterling (“GBP”) a share, with a further option to purchase the remaining 10% at a price to be fixed by an agreed formula.

On 11 July 2001 the President of the Bratislava I District Court informed the applicant that the judge dealing with the case had a heavy workload and that she had therefore not yet started examining the

The foam mattresses often lack bedding (sheets are made of paper and are distributed periodically so, if they break, people are left with none) ...

She subsequently gained weight, was discharged, lost weight and was readmitted on 25 August 1988 where she remained for a thorough assessment.

However, if he is satisfied with the charge sheet accompanying the circumstantial letter (see 5. below), he can simply countersign the charge sheet.

However, if he is satisfied with the charge sheet accompanying the circumstantial letter (see 5. below), he can simply countersign the charge sheet.

Committee instituted criminal proceedings on account of aggravated tax evasion against the applicant, former executive director and founder of “Pizza Di Roma” LLC (the company), who held 100% of its shares

      The applicant was not provided with an individual sleeping place and had to share one with inmates. No separation of toilet from living area.

the meeting.

At the Hunters’ Council’s meeting in 1954 the question of compensation for the Thule Tribe’s relocation arose for the first time, but not until after their meetings in 1959 and 1960 did they submit formal

In respect of a civil claim she argues that it could not have provided an effective remedy within the meaning of the Convention.

    In parallel with those measures, disputes arose about how shares belonging to the estate were to be sold.

In February 1985, the applicants' mother donated the property to her two daughters in equal shares. 9.

She argued that she had been the first on a priority list drawn up by company S. for the distribution of flats.

company violated their respective right to freedom of religion within the meaning of Article 9 para. 1 (Art. 9-1).

Then his relatives sent him a mattress, a blanket, a pillow, sheets and a pillow case. 2.     Sanitary and hygienic conditions 10.

The programme might have shed doubts on the legitimacy of A.’s conviction, which was final.

    On 26 September 2003 the court summoned A.C. to specify his and A.C.R.’s shares in the co-ownership. 29.