CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 564 résultats pour « STUBBE Marc »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC000887604

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2005

20 octobre 2005

On 23 March 2000, the Deputy Minister rejected the first applicant’s objection of 15 July 1999.

Source officielle

Page 67 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0616JUD004042412

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2022

16 juin 2022

    Although Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 applies only to a person’s existing possessions and does not create a right to acquire property (see Stummer v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127DEC002125209

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2012

27 novembre 2012

All relevant scientific studies confirmed that the main problems arose with gambling machines in restaurants and casinos.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1123JUD001403288

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 1993

23 novembre 1993

  On 5 March 1986 counsel for Mr Poitrimol lodged an appeal and the prosecution immediately did likewise. 18.

Source officielle
CC

cr

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:CR00735

Cassation

15 mai 2019

15 mai 2019

M..., contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de ROUEN, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 9 mars 2017, qui a condamné le premier pour abus de confiance et escroquerie à deux ans d'emprisonnement dont un an

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0126JUD004278806

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2017

26 janvier 2017

    On 6 March 2000 this application was refused. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164856

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2016

16 juin 2016

    Application no. 16281/11 lodged on 10   March 2011 by Ostap   POPOVSCHI, who was born on 18   September 1985 and lives in Tiraspol, represented by Alexandru POSTICA.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD002682806

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2012

26 juin 2012

    Furthermore, in an individual case (Up-211/04) brought by one of the “erased”, claiming that his absence from Slovenia was due to the state of war, on 2 March 2006 the Constitutional Court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD005746715

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2021

7 décembre 2021

In that connection it referred to the reports of 13   March and 16 April 2008 (see paragraphs 17-20 above).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD004514214

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2016

12 juillet 2016

    On 5 March 2015 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0310JUD004997216

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2020

10 mars 2020

Those who enjoy draft deferments (such as for the purpose of university studies) are to lodge their applications within ten days of such deferment coming to an end. 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0321JUD003814420

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2023

21 mars 2023

However, studies had shown that those risks could be mitigated by frequent meaningful contact between the children and their imprisoned parents. The Court’s assessment 38.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0725JUD002730914

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2019

25 juillet 2019

    On 2 March 2012 the applicants appealed against that decision, arguing that the first-instance court’s finding had been incorrect. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD001990092

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2010

26 octobre 2010

The heirs of applicant no. 5 (Mr Phivos Economou and Mrs Elli Economou) produced certificates of ownership of Turkish-occupied immovable property showing that on 15 March 2010 the “land with two houses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0514DEC001518910

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2013

14 mai 2013

    The applicant was a functionary of the Security Service from 16   December 1973 to 31 March 1990. On the latter date he retired. 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD002938909

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2019

17 décembre 2019

    On 3 March 2014 this complaint was communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 § 3 of the Rules of Court. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004JUD002936595

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2005

4 octobre 2005

    Another publishing company originally published this book in March 1991.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0617DEC000348521

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2025

17 juin 2025

  Romania , no. 8361/21, §   35, 21   March 2023): Article 1 “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:1204JUD000771076

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 1979

4 décembre 1979

In its report of 9 March 1978, the Commission expresses the opinion: - by nine votes to five, that there has not been a breach of Article 5 para. 3 (art. 5-3) of the Convention; - by eleven votes to one

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0502JUD003571897

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2000

2 mai 2000

    The Judicial Studies Board guideline direction at the time of the Court of Appeal's consideration of the applicant's appeal provided that: “If he failed to mention ... when he was questioned

Source officielle