CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC000887604
20 octobre 2005
On 23 March 2000, the Deputy Minister rejected the first applicant’s objection of 15 July 1999.
Page 67 sur 79
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0616JUD004042412
16 juin 2022
Although Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 applies only to a person’s existing possessions and does not create a right to acquire property (see Stummer v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127DEC002125209
27 novembre 2012
All relevant scientific studies confirmed that the main problems arose with gambling machines in restaurants and casinos.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1123JUD001403288
23 novembre 1993
On 5 March 1986 counsel for Mr Poitrimol lodged an appeal and the prosecution immediately did likewise. 18.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:CR00735
15 mai 2019
M..., contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de ROUEN, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 9 mars 2017, qui a condamné le premier pour abus de confiance et escroquerie à deux ans d'emprisonnement dont un an
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0126JUD004278806
26 janvier 2017
On 6 March 2000 this application was refused. 11.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164856
16 juin 2016
Application no. 16281/11 lodged on 10 March 2011 by Ostap POPOVSCHI, who was born on 18 September 1985 and lives in Tiraspol, represented by Alexandru POSTICA.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD002682806
26 juin 2012
Furthermore, in an individual case (Up-211/04) brought by one of the “erased”, claiming that his absence from Slovenia was due to the state of war, on 2 March 2006 the Constitutional Court
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD005746715
7 décembre 2021
In that connection it referred to the reports of 13 March and 16 April 2008 (see paragraphs 17-20 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD004514214
12 juillet 2016
On 5 March 2015 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0310JUD004997216
10 mars 2020
Those who enjoy draft deferments (such as for the purpose of university studies) are to lodge their applications within ten days of such deferment coming to an end. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0321JUD003814420
21 mars 2023
However, studies had shown that those risks could be mitigated by frequent meaningful contact between the children and their imprisoned parents. The Court’s assessment 38.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0725JUD002730914
25 juillet 2019
On 2 March 2012 the applicants appealed against that decision, arguing that the first-instance court’s finding had been incorrect. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD001990092
26 octobre 2010
The heirs of applicant no. 5 (Mr Phivos Economou and Mrs Elli Economou) produced certificates of ownership of Turkish-occupied immovable property showing that on 15 March 2010 the “land with two houses
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0514DEC001518910
14 mai 2013
The applicant was a functionary of the Security Service from 16 December 1973 to 31 March 1990. On the latter date he retired. 33.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD002938909
17 décembre 2019
On 3 March 2014 this complaint was communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 § 3 of the Rules of Court. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004JUD002936595
4 octobre 2005
Another publishing company originally published this book in March 1991.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0617DEC000348521
17 juin 2025
Romania , no. 8361/21, § 35, 21 March 2023): Article 1 “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:1204JUD000771076
4 décembre 1979
In its report of 9 March 1978, the Commission expresses the opinion: - by nine votes to five, that there has not been a breach of Article 5 para. 3 (art. 5-3) of the Convention; - by eleven votes to one
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0502JUD003571897
2 mai 2000
The Judicial Studies Board guideline direction at the time of the Court of Appeal's consideration of the applicant's appeal provided that: “If he failed to mention ... when he was questioned