AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0711JUD005724014
11 juillet 2019
11 juillet 2019
On 19 August 2014 the Court applied an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and priority treatment was given to the case under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0322JUD004773206
22 mars 2016
22 mars 2016
They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188502
22 novembre 2018
22 novembre 2018
Constitutional Court Rules of Procedure ( Poslovnik o radu Ustavnog suda; published in OG RS no. 24/08, 27/08 and 76/11) 11.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC000606809
1 octobre 2013
1 octobre 2013
He claims under Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of Court reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred by the proceedings before the Court of 4,472.95 Euros (EUR). B.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0511DEC001267987
11 mai 1988
11 mai 1988
43 para. 3 (a) of the Rules of Procedure.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD002151418
6 mars 2025
6 mars 2025
He accordingly requested the revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1107DEC000689724
7 novembre 2024
7 novembre 2024
47 § 4 of the Rules of the Court, the decision to indicate an interim measure to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court; the declaration submitted
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0407DEC007016214
7 avril 2015
7 avril 2015
On 31 October 2014, upon the applicants’ request, the President of the First Section decided to apply interim measures pursuant to Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, and requested the Austrian
Source officielle6e Section - 3e Chambre
DTA_2122478_20230519
19 mai 2023
19 mai 2023
demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 3 février 2021, par lequel le ministre de l'intérieur a mis fin à son détachement dans l'emploi fonctionnel de responsable d'unité locale de police (RULP
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC000551908
19 janvier 2010
19 janvier 2010
Rule 39 was refused on 18 July 2008 as the primary basis of the applicant’s complaints fell outside the scope of Rule 39; although he also made complaints under Article 3, these were not substantiated
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1207DEC001557689
7 décembre 1989
7 décembre 1989
Finally, the applicants allege that the failure of Sweden to comply with the Commission's indication under Rule 36 of its Rules of Procedure violated the applicants' right
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002583694
2 septembre 1997
2 septembre 1997
and designated the lawyer who would represent her (Rule 31).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109DEC003759597
9 novembre 1999
9 novembre 1999
It comprises “three distinct rules”: the first rule, set out in the first sentence of the first paragraph, is of a general nature and enunciates the principle of the peaceful enjoyment of property; the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605DEC004031416
5 juin 2018
5 juin 2018
Rule 39 of the Rules of Court 17.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002584394
2 septembre 1997
2 septembre 1997
Bernhardt, the Vice-President of the Court (Rule 21 § 4 (b)).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122JUD000391215
22 janvier 2019
22 janvier 2019
54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122JUD001201816
22 janvier 2019
22 janvier 2019
The application was further granted priority (Rule 47) and confidentiality (Rule 33) and the applicant was granted anonymity (Rule 47 § 4). 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002557594
2 septembre 1997
2 septembre 1997
designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 31).
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2583653-2809847
16 décembre 2008
16 décembre 2008
Rupa fut admis à l’hôpital psychiatrique en raison de douleurs persistantes dues aux coups reçus à la tête.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD005686108
15 novembre 2016
15 novembre 2016
The Government accordingly requested a revision of the judgment under Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.
Source officiellePage 67 sur 2215