[F] [S] [Adresse 3] [Localité 8] Représenté par Me Christine DE ROQUETAILLADE de la SELARL DE ROQUETAILLADE, avocat au barreau de LYON et par Me Sophie LACQUIT, avocat au barreau de CLERMONT-FERRAND

BRICO DEPOT prise en la personne de son Président en exercice domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représentée par Me Sophie LACQUIT, avocat au barreau de CLERMONT-FERRAND

prise en son établissement sis [Adresse 3] et en la personne de son représentant légal en exercice domicilié en cette qualité audit établissement [Adresse 2] [Localité 5] Représentée par Me Sophie LACQUIT

  It is noted in this respect that [the applicant] will not be precluded from claiming damages from the NNF during a possible lawsuit, if [he] finds that during the settlement negotiations the NNF

Referring further to the money allocated by the local council for the purposes of the lawsuit against the applicant organisation, it was stated: “To what extent is it lawful or expedient to spend more

Consequently, the applicant and his mother lodged a lawsuit against G., arguing that she was impeding their communication with the children and requesting the court to allow the applicant, his mother and

    Original proceedings concerning the reinstatement claim The applicant filed a lawsuit, alleging wrongful dismissal and seeking reinstatement.

  On 14 October 1987 the merits of the applicant's lawsuit were examined by the District Court of Stockholm sitting with a jury of nine members.

    On an unspecified date in 2005, the applicant lodged a lawsuit with the Yasamal District Court asking the court to order the eviction of O. and her family from the flat. 12.

V., in order to be informed of the date of the determination of lawsuit No. 29/87. The reply he received was that the case was under investigation in Nicosia without explanation by which body.

    By judgment of 2 May 1997 the City Court granted in part the applicant’s lawsuit awarding him 29,400 EEK for moral damages and 14,530 EEK for farming expenses.

PANAME TP Agissant poursuites et diligences de son Présidnet, Mme [I] [W], domiciliée en cette qualité au siège social, sis [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] Représentée par Me Nathalie MONSARRAT LACOURT

619 Plaidant : Me Frédéric DANILOWIEZ, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : G156 SAS BOUYGUES BATIMENT ILE DE FRANCE venant aux droits de la société OF EQUIPEMENT nouvellement dénommée OLIN LANCTUIT

929 Représentée par Me Anne GRAPPOTTE-BENETREAU de la SCP GRAPPOTTE BENETREAU, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : K0111 Ayant pour avocat plaidant Me Jean-Jacques RAQUIN de la SCP LACOURTE-RAQUIN-TATAR

Par un mémoire enregistré le 18 juillet 2023, et un mémoire enregistré le 5 octobre 2023, non communiqué, la société Truyesol, représentée par la SCP Lacourte Raquin Tatar, conclut à titre principal au

In particular, she had failed to bring a separate civil lawsuit under Articles 172, 199 and 200 of the Obligations Act, as well as to refer to the relevant provisions of the Convention which were directly

APPELANTE : d'un jugement rendu le 12 mai 2023 par le Conseil de Prud'hommes de REIMS, section Commerce (n° F 22/00358) Madame [T] [L] [Adresse 4] [Localité 1] Représentée par la SELARL LAQUILLE

d'un jugement rendu le 14 octobre 2024 par le Conseil de Prud'hommes de REIMS, section Activités Diverses (n° F 24/00004) Madame [Z] [V] [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] Représentée par la SELARL LAQUILLE

    Section 22 provided that, as of the date of this Act’s entry into force (12 December 1998), “all pending lawsuits, including judicial enforcement proceedings, aimed at the collection of the

Her lawsuit stated that there had been no proof of any immoral acts and the sole ground for dismissal had been her sexual orientation, which was discriminatory and contrary to the constitutional provisions