CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
1ère Chambre A
5fda688f075b73b1c533ebee
4 juillet 2019
Sur les demandes de garantie de la société Icade dirigées contre la société Bec Construction et la société Colas Méditerranée : Sur la fin de non-recevoir opposée par la société Bec Construction :
Page 67 sur 1586
3ème Chbre Cab B4
670d5fd7d1ffbed0eed8cf8a
10 octobre 2024
La société par actions simplifiée à associé unique BENZ AUTO 13 a réglé la facture du garage KDM AUTO.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520JUD003739411
20 mai 2014
assessed, or too low a tax to be assessed or a tax to be unduly refunded, shall be sentenced for tax fraud to a fine or to imprisonment for a period of up to two years. 32.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0212JUD005262314
12 février 2019
Under circumstances stated in Paragraph 3, the estate may be fined.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0616JUD004439605
16 juin 2016
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Igor Tarasov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD002888214
14 juin 2022
The applicant did not contest that a point of appeal against a criminal conviction based on the ne bis in idem principle might be a remedy to be exhausted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0416JUD007209814
16 avril 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1213JUD001442612
13 décembre 2022
Finally, in the applicant’s case, the second set of proceedings cannot be said to be a reopening of the same proceedings but were rather a separate process on the same facts and legal grounds. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606JUD004734214
6 juin 2019
Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613JUD004178811
13 juin 2017
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Šimkus v.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11521
18 mai 2017
Iceland - 22007/11 Judgment 18.5.2017 [Section I] Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Parallel administrative and criminal proceedings in respect of the same conduct: violation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD007147511
11 janvier 2022
It must therefore be declared admissible. 11. The applicant maintained his complaint. 12. Referring to Oliveira v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0623JUD000851607
23 juin 2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD001643210
10 décembre 2020
A ... court decision imposing an administrative sanction shall be final and may not be appealed against ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD005319713
10 février 2015
quashed and the tax surcharges be withdrawn.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD006013016
13 janvier 2022
It must therefore be declared admissible. 6. The general principles concerning ne bis in idem have been summarized in A and B v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD003000915
1 mars 2022
SERBIA (Application no. 30009/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 March 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD001703913
27 janvier 2015
He also requested that an oral hearing be held. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0518JUD002200711
Cour d'Appel
6253cdd6bd3db21cbdd94a9c
5 octobre 2020
J... est imputable à son employeur la SAS Kaz An Nou Bel, - condamné la SAS Kaz An Nou Bel, en la personne de son représentant légal, de payer à Monsieur N...