CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

42 707 résultats pour « Auguste »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158645

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2015

14 octobre 2015

According to two reports submitted by the Government and each signed by three SIZO employees, on 6 August, 27 November 2014 and 4 June 2015 the applicant was repeatedly offered an opportunity to undergo

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208509

Admin. suprême

11 février 2021

11 février 2021

In any event, between 27   June and 24   August 2018 the applicant did not apply to the bailiff for assistance in his contacts with the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3500

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2006

17 janvier 2006

In the meantime, on 11 August 1999, the Court had decided, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, to request the French Government to refrain from deporting the applicant until 24   August, the date

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221952

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2022

28 novembre 2022

On 2 August 2021 he was apprehended by Lithuanian border guards near the Lithuanian-Belarussian border.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215438

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2022

4 janvier 2022

It took between twenty-one and twenty-seven days for the Skopje Court of Appeal to examine the applicant’s appeals against the extension orders of 26 August and 25 December 2019, as well as the order of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245296

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2025

9 septembre 2025

After his medical examination he was provided with Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy on 10 August 2016.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0111DEC001914091

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 1994

11 janvier 1994

    In August 1980 his wife in Morocco gave birth to a son and in July 1982 to a daughter. This marriage was dissolved by the applicant’s repudiation of his wife in 1984.

Source officielle
CAA

3ème chambre (formation à 3)

DCA_20BX03889_20221025

Admin. Appel

25 octobre 2022

25 octobre 2022

Mme A soutient avoir été victime de harcèlement moral du fait des agissements de Mme D, directrice de l'école maternelle Auguste Renoir depuis 2004. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915DEC001465309

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2020

15 septembre 2020

xa0; Pauliine Koskelo,   Tim Eicke, judges, and Renata Degener, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 February 2009, Having regard to the decision of 24 August

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC002909295

Admin. suprême

24 août 1999

24 août 1999

However, no title deed had been issued in the applicant’s name before 15 August 1974, as the procedure for the parcelling out of plot No. 343/1 had not yet been completed.

Source officielle
CAA

1ère chambre - formation à 3

DCA_21MA02087_20230608

Admin. Appel

8 juin 2023

8 juin 2023

Le terrain d'assiette du projet est bordé par la rue Auguste Aiguier qui constitue sa voie de desserte.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531DEC004130404

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2011

31 mai 2011

    On 22 August 2002 the Bucharest County Court partially allowed the applicant’s action and annulled solely the order of 11 March 2002.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1203DEC003007896

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 1997

3 décembre 1997

       On 19 August 1994 the Ministry of the Interior dismissed the applicant's appeal in the asylum proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0710DEC001288987

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1989

10 juillet 1989

  The latter argued that, considering that the request was made on 20 August 1986, and that 23 and 24 August were a Saturday and Sunday, the time-limit within which the President should have decided

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1104DEC001930012

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2021

4 novembre 2021

    On 31 August 2011 the High Administrative Court of Ukraine (“the HACU”) upheld the decision of 4 September 2007. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0124JUD001211503

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2008

24 janvier 2008

On 12 March 2002 the Smolensk Regional Court upheld the judgment of 27 August 2001 on appeal. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614DEC004240909

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2011

14 juin 2011

By a letter of 21 August 2009 the Prosecutor General of Ukraine informed the Government’s Agent that relations between Ukraine and Belarus in the extradition domain were quite positive.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164416

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2016

3 juin 2016

    Decisions of 10 August 2012 on prolonging additional security measures (a)     the Decisions On 10 August 2012 the prison administration decided to prolong the application of additional

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2073661-2195766

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

26 juillet 2007

On 29 August 2004 the Chamber to which the application had been allocated, decided to grant priority to the application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC005427512

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

2006 Už-1386/2010 of 17 October 2012 600 Euros   14856/13 28/01/2013 Jela BRALUŠIĆ 25/02/1952 Serbian   Snežana JOKIĆ Čačak 21 February 2006 21 August 2006 Už-1386/2010 of 17 October 2012 600

Source officielle

Page 67 sur 2136

← PrécédentSuivant →