The applicant subsequently brought an action in the Istanbul Administrative Court, seeking to have that order set aside.

       The hearing of the application to set aside took place before a Recorder in private.

  Pointing out that setting aside a final judgment is contrary to the principle of the certainty of legal relations, the Court held that by applying the provisions on applications to set aside in

de 18.000,00 € TTC, suivant facture n° FA0000009130 du 16 Mars 2022, frais de dossier et de carte grise compris ; La facture indiquait « Véhicule révisé et garanti référence 12 mois suivant contrat ASA

Courant 2021 la commune avait ordonné l’interruption des travaux, au motif que le projet prévoyait le déversement des eaux pluviales du lotissement dans le canal desservant l’ASA de [Localité 4], et du

xa0;     by ASSARGENERATOR HB                          and ASSAR

On 16   December 1999 Athens Administrative Court of Appeal set aside the disputed administrative decision.

November 1965 to set aside the plans. The City of Hamburg appealed (Berufung) against this decision to the Administrative Court of Appeal (Oberverwaltungsgericht) which fixed a hearing for ..

two months from the date on which the decision was served “to bring an appeal before the Rennes Administrative Court”, and so on 1 June 1989 the applicant lodged with that court an application to set aside

    By a judgment of 24 May 2013, the Kovpakivskyy District Court of Sumy allowed the claim, set aside the decision of 4 June 2008 and the deed of 17 September 2008 and obliged the applicant

#xa0; The application concerns an alleged lack of legal certainty and coherence in proceedings for compensation for damage caused by an administrative decision of 8 December 1980 which was later set aside

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }     FOURTH SECTION CASE OF ASAN

    On the same day the Court of Appeal set aside the decision of the Nogatinski District Court on the ground that, until 23 December 2005, Mrs   Jabelia and her family had been living in

    On 17 February 2014 the Sevastopol Administrative Court of Appeal (“the Court of Appeal”) set aside as unlawful and unsubstantiated the above ‑ mentioned decisions of 18 February 2013

    He did so on 16 July 2020, some three months after the measure had been imposed, requesting that the Constitutional Court’s decision be set aside and the measure be lifted (see paragraph

Furthermore, they stressed that the setting aside of the unlawful administrative decision amounted to sufficient redress for the applicant company. 16.

It set aside the judgment of 11   October   1999 and the decision of 16   December   1999 and substituted its own decision dismissing the applicant's claim.

#Tomra Systems ASA m.fl. mot Europeiska kommissionen.

#Tomra Systems ASA a i. proti Európskej komisii.