CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012JUD001543719
12 octobre 2021
Until 2013, that is, even after the separation from the mother, the applicant continued to share the care of both children with her. First set of proceedings 4 .
Page 66 sur 238
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD001707005
16 janvier 2007
Counsel for the applicant then filed submissions requesting that the court take formal note that unlawful communication within the meaning of Article 304 of the Code of Criminal Procedure had taken
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC002628395
26 juin 1996
The interference at issue was, therefore, in accordance with the law within the meaning of Article 8 para. 2 (Art. 8-2).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0323JUD000542016
23 mars 2023
The applicant did not indicate any specific or approximate dates of those meetings.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199
12 mai 2005
was suspected of having campaigned against Turkey's interests and of having taken part in meetings organised by the PKK) created a risk of prejudice to public order in Turkey. 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD007256210
22 février 2018
The third video showed a meeting between A.C. and M.T. in the latter’s office.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0108DEC001259686
8 janvier 1992
It was therefore ordered in accordance with a "procedure prescribed by law" within the meaning of Article 5 para. 1 (Art. 5-1) of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0108DEC001259688
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118DEC003437903
18 novembre 2008
On 17 April 2002 the Republika Srpska took over the judgment debt, pursuant to section 20 of the Opening Balance Sheets Act 1998.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC000043312
17 septembre 2013
relevant contractual clauses infringed their property rights under the Convention, in so far as they had acquired an unlimited airspace which because of the above mentioned judgments they now had to share
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0109DEC003437903
9 janvier 2007
On 17 April 2002 the Republika Srpska took over the judgment debt, pursuant to section 20 of the Opening Balance Sheets Act 1998 ( Zakon o početnom bilansu stanja u postupku privatizacije državnog kapitala
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179690
1 décembre 2017
She argued that J.P. had not registered the purchase agreement within three months, meaning the purchase procedure had not been completed and the subsequent purchase agreements had to be annulled.
12e chambre
5fdaed46058dcc80d2961547
7 mai 2019
Mars 2018 par le Tribunal de Commerce de NANTERRE N° Chambre : 1 N° Section : N° RG : 2016F2070 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions Copies délivrées le : à : Me Anne-laure DUMEAU Me Mélina
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD000002203
9 avril 2009
Two to five detainees had to share one shower and had to wash themselves and their clothes during this short time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC001202502
9 octobre 2012
He had arranged for the meeting to take place at the Prosecutor’s Office in order to report him to his friends who worked there.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103JUD003081406
3 novembre 2009
She raised the question at a meeting held by the school on 22 April 2002, pointing out that the Court of Cassation, in judgment no. 4273 of 1 March 2000, had ruled that the presence of a crucifix in the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0927DEC003812706
27 septembre 2016
The enforcement order had not amounted to a final and enforceable court decision within the meaning of the Bilateral Agreement.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-84548
15 juillet 1999
RIGHTS EXCESSIVE LENGTH OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE CIVIL COURTS IN ITALY: SUPPLEMENTARY MEASURES OF A GENERAL CHARACTER (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 July 1999, at the 677th meeting
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1009JUD002959317
9 octobre 2018
Many of the mattresses were dirty and worn, or consisted of broken pieces of foam held together by a sheet.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0518JUD002200711
18 mai 2017
The third applicant has failed to show that it wished to pursue its application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.